Spot an error? Highlight the words or lines you want to fix — an “edit” button appears, and the panel opens with your selection ready to edit.
Will: All right. Hello and welcome, everyone, to another episode of Waiting to Be Signed. We've got a special interview episode for you today — a collector interview. We're joined by McLlama, who you might know from the fx(hash) sales feed, and also his Twitter account, which I should have had open, because your handle isn't @McLlama on Twitter, but we'll plug that in a moment. Hey man, thanks for coming on the show.
McLlama: Thanks for having me, it's an honor. I've been going back through some episodes I missed in recent months, and you've interviewed my favorite artists and some really cool collectors. So happy to be here.
Will: What stood out to you on the artist side?
McLlama: Erik Swahn and Zancan, for sure — my favorite artists. I'd already listened to the Erik Swahn one, but the Zancan interview was more recent, so it was good to catch up on that.
Will: Recent in terms of episode numbers, anyway — we've slowed down a lot, so it's probably not that far back. Let's kick this off. Introduce yourself however you like, and tell us about your background in collecting and how you came to NFTs and generative art in particular.
McLlama: I work in a data engineer type role, so I'm on the computer all the time, which works out well for collecting — I can keep tabs on things easily. As far as getting into NFT art, I have no formal art background whatsoever. It was all through crypto, as I'm sure is a common story. I got into crypto around 2017, bought the top of that first cycle, and have been through full market cycles since. Same with my collecting generally — from Pokémon to NFTs, I've been through market cycles my whole life. I used to trade high-end basketball cards too, so I've felt the pain of selling grails too early, many times over. That's a big part of my conviction with collecting these days.
NFTs just feel like a natural extension of that. Even collecting physical things, you're on the computer constantly, browsing eBay, browsing social media — so it all feels of a piece. It's been a really fun time, and it's one of those collectible categories I don't see myself ever leaving. I might sell off physical trading cards and step away from that for a while, but I'll never be able to sell all my NFTs. I'm here for the long haul.
Will: If you look at the offers on fx(hash), you might think there's some stuff you're definitely never going to be able to sell. I did a little selling recently myself — small stuff, 3 tez, 5 tez here and there, just to clear out the wallet. It's pretty dire out there. As for your path in — did you come in through PFPs and then cross into art through Art Blocks?
McLlama: Pretty much the typical path. I started out minting hype PFPs I saw on my Twitter feed, almost all of which are completely dead at this point. I dabbled with Art Blocks, but I think I was late to it — minting factory stuff, and I didn't really have the funds to collect anything serious at the time, despite that being the peak of the bull run when I had the most crypto of my life. Like most collectors, you tend to come in at the top. That's what happened to me.
Will: Let me ask about your collecting philosophy. Actually, let's start here: I feel like the cohort of people still here collecting art — myself included — didn't come into crypto expecting to get this interested in art. For me it was accidental: I found Tezos through someone I knew, found Hic Et Nunc, minted a few things because I had some tez and didn't know what else to do with it, thought it was cool, and then fx(hash) came along and I got swept up in the Discord, the community, staying up all night for mints back in 2021. For you, what was it about generative art — and art in general — that struck a chord and got you collecting beyond just speculation?
McLlama: Starting on Hic Et Nunc, it felt raw. There was a certain aesthetic to it — really basic, just browsing a feed of random art — and something about that was really enjoyable. I found myself gravitating toward certain collections I kept running into, and eventually became one of the biggest collectors of a few artists there. Then when fx(hash) came out, that's when the addictive part of my personality kicked in. It was like ripping packs of Pokémon cards — you don't know what you're gonna get. I still love that.
At first I was doing the "mint two, sell one, cover my cost basis" thing. That works for a while, but then you realize what you missed out on when it comes to the real grails, and I learned a lot through that. It was months to a year after that initial fx(hash) rush that I really started connecting with the projects. Farbteiler, for example — I kept coming back to it and realized I wanted to hoard these, that it wasn't enough to just have a few. I developed real connections to certain projects, and from there my feed became purely art. It went from crypto Twitter meme-posting to — wow, most of my followers are artists and art collectors now. It was a lot of content to take in, but over time I've realized I genuinely connect with certain projects and artists, and it's more than just making a trade.
Farbteiler — Erik Swahn
Will: Have you gone as far as getting prints and plots made, arranging stuff around the house? When we talked to Erik, I tried to suss out whether Farbteiler was plottable — he said he'd done some experiments he never sold. For someone like you, who owns so much of his work, do you have anything from Erik on the wall, or from other artists?
McLlama: As far as prints and plots go, I really value having that gated by the artist — I want the signed print, I don't want to print it myself. That's not a knock on anyone who prints stuff they own; that's awesome too. It's just, for me, as someone who's historically collected physical things, there's real value in that physical connection — it's an additional layer to the collection.
I have a really cool plotted piece by Joanie Lemercier — and by the way, apologies in advance if I mispronounce any artist or collector names. All of this lives in my head from this online world; I don't talk to people about it in real life much. I also have a print of one of my KGMs from Zancan and Yazid — a giant piece in my living room — and a signed Ganbrood piece too, which is rare, since he doesn't do many of those. A few random plots here and there, but my physical collection is still pretty small. Especially with my recent pickups, I'm interested in growing that side of things. You can tell my room here is pretty barren — that's intentional, since I take work calls in this spot, and I'd rather not open myself up to conversation with random colleagues and acquaintances about it. But yeah, I definitely want to keep growing the physical side.
Will: Right on. What's your philosophy now? All of us who came into NFTs did so with some level of speculation, hype, hopes and dreams for where it might go. Maybe you still hold that long view. I'm honestly undecided myself these days, given how challenging the market is. But for you as a collector — how do you value the projects and artists you collect beyond pure aesthetics? There used to be a lot of discussion about being in the first hundred fx(hash) projects, the importance of that legacy, and the same with early Art Blocks. A lot of the early Art Blocks work, aside from the big grails like Ringers, doesn't hold up visually anymore — some of it looks pretty bad now. But there was a time, and maybe there still are completionists, who feel you need to own those first however-many projects. Do you subscribe to any rules like that? With Pokémon, vintage matters beyond just playability. How do you think about it?
McLlama: I wouldn't say I have hard rules. Sometimes I'm just browsing historic collections and think, "wow, this is one of the first hundred projects, this is really cool, I need to buy this" — but it's not an intentional mindset. Obviously it's easy to look at all-time volume as a shorthand for what the most important projects are. So it's a combination: historic volume plus how deeply I connect with the art. It's not exactly a hot take to say Garden, Monoliths is a grail — anyone could tell you that. But really sitting with a collection, appreciating the depth of the outputs, getting into it — that's something I've enjoyed doing over the years. It's not just historical pricing and volume, but genuine appreciation. I'd say I collect intuitively, or like to think so, in terms of market cycles — though we honestly haven't had a real market cycle with these pieces yet. So really, it just comes down to what I want to collect.
Will: How do you feel about the long term? There were so many narratives — auction houses adopting NFTs, which happened to a small degree; institutions adopting them, with some high-profile donations and the odd museum purchase — but none of that turned out to be the inciting event the community expected back in 2021. Do you hold out hope for crossing into the mainstream, either toward traditional art institutions or in the other direction — forget those institutions, crypto just scales 100x from here, and these collectibles become interesting in their own right once there are that many more people who want to collect this stuff?
Farbteiler — Erik Swahn
McLlama: I could see it being a combination of those, ideally. I'd love to see more institutional adoption, but that's a really long-term horizon, and I don't think institutional investors have that kind of patience right now. A lot of the crypto market has shorter-term horizons, and that's why everyone is so frustrated waiting for the NFT bull run this cycle. I don't know exactly how it'll play out, but I see a lot of opportunity in this price action, as horrible and illiquid as it is. As just a normal person, you can acquire pieces that two or three years ago would have been absolutely impossible to buy. The pink GM I bought a month or so ago, for example, would have been unfathomable just two years ago. I see it as an opportunity to make your place in the history of whatever plays out. I can't tell you what's going to happen, but it's been really fun.
Will: It was probably about two and a half years ago that Le Random acquired their pink GM, and it was a big deal. I can't remember the USD equivalent, but it was certainly tens of thousands of dollars. Quite expensive.
McLlama: You might want to fact-check me, but I think it was over $100K.
Will: I know they timed it very closely with the purchase of RGB #1 too. So they made their mark, grabbing two keystone pieces from fx(hash) history. Anyone who was building a collection two and a half years ago has got to be looking now and thinking, imagine what we could have had. I've browsed your collection a bit -- you're very Erik Swahn heavy, and a lot of that increase has come from recent activity, as we've seen so many longtime collectors, for whatever reason, starting to divest, at least from fx(hash) if not across all chains. Did you see this trend and decide now's the time to jump in because we're down 90% on this stuff? Or have you been slowly acquiring along the way? What inspired you to jump in now, in all of this chaos?
RGB — ciphrd
McLlama: I've been collecting the Farbs pretty heavily for the last few years, so that's just a constant. I could keep buying them, but at a certain point it gets ridiculous. More recently I've been focused on the grails -- the Garden, Monoliths pieces, the dragons, and so on. Part of it is what you said: prices are down so much that it's very appealing to buy right now. But it's also the timing of another market I've been participating in. I actually bought quite a few vintage Pokémon cards around 2024 -- more than I was buying NFTs at the time -- and they did really, really well early this year. So I started selling some of them, and that's been funding my grail purchases on fx(hash). Life handed me this opportunity and the timing just made sense. I like the price of the art right now, and I've got liquidity to tap into. It's a combination of things. And honestly, the fact that people are even listing these grails at all is fortunate too.
Will: Do you give any thought to the viability of chains? For as long as we've been collecting on Tezos, there's been FUD around it being a ghost chain, a lot of ill will toward the founders, the way they handled the ICO -- people kind of forgot about it, but the stink never really went away. There's this constant expectation that the chain will fail despite having been around for years. You'd think the whole "Lindy effect" idea would apply -- Tezos has been around a long time -- but it never seems to earn that credit. At the same time, we're seeing people turn on ETH now too. I'm sure you follow a lot of these Ethereum people, but even the Bankless folks have finally turned on ETH and sold all of it. There's FUD around the foundation and how they've handled the L2s, cannibalizing their own fees. So maybe a better way to phrase this: have you thought recently about preservation -- what happens if a chain goes down, or if a platform like fx(hash) goes down? What's your approach to that?
McLlama: I'll start with the Tezos FUD. As someone who's been in crypto since 2017, I can tell you a lot of the crypto OGs hating on Tezos right now used to absolutely love it. In 2019 and 2020, Tezos was all the hype, and people treated it as a real investment. A lot of people got burned by the price action. Fundamentally, it's a really great blockchain, in some ways superior to Ethereum, and I have no problem using it as a basic user -- I love it. But it left a bad taste in those OGs' opinions, and that carried through the NFT cycle. Then everyone made millions of dollars on ETH and Art Blocks, and it became, "well, look at Tezos, the price just keeps going down, why would I collect there?" It's elitist psychology combined with the fact that they did genuinely like the chain at one time -- now it's an emotional thing for a lot of people. Do I fear the blockchain will ever shut down? Not in the foreseeable future.
To your next question: preservation has become extremely important, especially with the impending -- if you want to call it that -- shutdown of fx(hash). We don't know for sure, but I wasn't expecting that to happen so suddenly. There was this several-week period where bad news was lurking in the air, but no one knew what was going on, and there was no communication from the team. It can happen suddenly, and you need to be ready for that. Have I done anything about it myself? No, but I've thought about it. Raster came out immediately after and said, sign up, create an account, and we'll back up your art for you -- they're not pinning the IPFS for you, so it's not complete redundancy, but people have been thinking about this seriously for years, and that gives me hope that nothing is going to completely disappear.
Will: I noticed that Raster thing and thought it was brilliant. I'd connected to Raster a while ago, so I don't know if they'd already backed things up for me, but it was awesome to see that 90-plus percent of my NFTs were covered -- a few corner cases from defunct platforms like Versum weren't, but still. We haven't battle-tested it, though -- if I ever lose access to my fx(hash) account, I have no idea what the experience will actually be like. Someone we've always talked about having on the show is Regina Harsanyi -- I've probably mangled her name -- she works in digital preservation. There are great videos of her on YouTube talking about the challenges of it, not just for NFTs but going back to digital art from the '80s and '70s, and how hard it is to make sure a piece still exists and lives the way the artist intended -- not just "oh, we still have the file," but displayed on the right machines, with colors that actually match. Things we'd never have thought about in 2021 when collecting on fx(hash) or Art Blocks.
McLlama: Right. It's more fragile than I thought. Even some of the on-chain stuff on fx(hash) sounds like more of a headache than the IPFS projects, from conversations I've seen. So it's definitely concerning. Am I panicking? No, definitely not.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: I have my fingers crossed that no matter what goes down, Ciphrd won't leave us completely screwed. He still seems to be plugging away, and if they're ever put in a position to shut down the platform, I hope -- and maybe even expect -- that he'll come up with something to make sure things still function in some fashion. Let's talk about fx(hash), though, because it's been such a crazy few months, and honestly a crazy two years for a show that's primarily covered it, trying to track everything going on with them and all their pivots. I shared some notes with you in advance: they moved to ETH, then Base, announced a curated program called Vertex that had one release and then nothing, and then things like fx(params) and OpenForm and the fx(hash) token. You've been here the whole time, collecting and engaging. What's your holistic take on the platform's history? Start wherever you want -- the tokens, or further back.
McLlama: Over-engineering has been one of my fears for the platform for the last couple of years -- not just the recent art coin thing. I feel like creating novelty was prioritized over a more curated approach, over getting big projects to mint there. We had the big grails, and then the artists who really succeeded moved on to different platforms and blockchains. So I feared the over-engineering thing for a while. More recently, I felt it was a bit much to drop art coins and OpenForm at the same time. It was Ciphrd's project -- the OpenForm project -- that unveiled the whole art coin thing.
Will:Genomes, right?
McLlama: No, this was after Genomes. This was Generations.
Will:Generations. Okay.
McLlama: Right. It was fully open form, meaning an unlimited number of iterations -- you could evolve your outputs, mutate them, create new outputs after minting. Technology-wise and art-wise, that's cool, but as a collector I think it totally removes the scarcity and value of the work. Why would I put any significant money into minting something I can change after I mint it, when there's an unlimited number of outputs?
Dragons — William Mapan
So I thought it was really cool, but it removes the financial aspect completely. And simultaneously, you're dropping art coins, which have nothing to do with art -- it's all financial, all about community and cult followings. That combination didn't quite land for me. If they'd paired art coins with, say -- just as an example -- Zancan dropping a really cool project the same day, it could have generated a lot of buzz. Instead the release fell flat.
There was a period where I still believed in the concept -- the fx(hash) token in particular was promising. I actually took note that the Zora token hit a $450 million market cap, while fx(hash) peaked at $15 million. The potential for the fx(hash) token was so great -- I genuinely thought it could go to $100 million. For a while I really believed that. It just didn't happen, and that was disappointing. After that there was no momentum -- crypto was starting the bear market from the highs, and NFTs were doing no better. The window of opportunity was that six-month period when Base memes and Zora were pumping and fx(hash) seemed like a natural fit, and it just didn't happen. That's my take on how it all played out.
Will: My only answer is that fx(hash) made the mistake of launching with too much of a product and actually saying, no, you're going to come here and collect real art and explore it — it's not just going to be you clicking a link on Twitter to some meme, YOLO-ing into it, and selling two hours later. They were actually trying to create something, and that was too hard in both senses of the word. It was a hard use case, but also hard to use compared to other options. If you're going to speculate on coins, why go through all the trouble of understanding the art and the artist? You can just follow big meme accounts or however people find whatever they're going to buy.
McLlama: I think ultimately they found that the people interested in using the platform weren't speculative investors — they actually wanted to mint cool art. There was this disconnect the entire time where the user experience kept getting worse because the art coins complicated things, and whatever cabal overlords there are decided not to pump the tokens. It just didn't work out.
Will: I don't know if you listened to the episode we did with Ciphrd around that time — it was obviously such a big moment for them, and they were very candid: if this doesn't work, the platform's in a lot of trouble. This is it. I kind of suspected that, but was surprised they'd actually admit it on the episode. It made sense to me from a career perspective for an artist, though. Thinking back — if someone like Zancan had launched an art coin like this in 2021 or late 2020, the idea of a career coin where the supply constantly goes down every time you release something, not necessarily tied to OpenForm, kind of makes sense if you could go back in time and launch it then. But as a Hail Mary move for a platform, and also expecting artists to pair it with OpenForm — this brand-new discipline — very few of the artists who released that way really pulled it off well.
It just felt tough. And when you don't have a follow-up quickly, you see the price action and volume stagnate on those tokens, because once all the natural minting is done, all that's left is to buy and sell the token and do nothing else with it. You're just waiting and waiting. I think we only saw one or two artists ever create a follow-up project using their same coin — it's a thing that needed years to prove itself out, and crypto doesn't have time for that. Neither did the platform.
Dragons — William Mapan
McLlama: That's the risk you take getting into that territory. Within a bull run, many cycles happen really fast, and once you lose that momentum, it's kind of over.
Will: What do you think about their more recent ideas around opening up the platform, doing a DAO? Are you fully out of $fxh? I'm sure you got a decent chunk in the airdrop.
McLlama: I sold a little bit of my allocation at first but held most of it — I think what I have now is worth like $100 or $200. I've never really seen the DAO thing play out, so I don't have much of an opinion on it. Assuming there's no miracle funding coming in — though there might be, they've been talking about something — I'd like to see them pivot toward preserving the art and enabling the marketplace to persist. That maintains the legacy. fx(hash) is such a significant chapter of generative art, and maintaining that platform in some degree, no matter what, is what I want to see. I don't know about the technical details of what that would require, but it seems like they need to trim their infrastructure costs quite a bit for anything to be possible.
Will: It would be awesome if the platform could persist in some way. I think they were floating the idea of keeping secondary going, since that's probably the only place they're really making revenue these days, if any. And maybe doing some curated releases — one, two, or three a year — which keeps their costs down since they're not constantly hosting new drops.
McLlama: That's what Art Blocks is doing right now, right? If I understand correctly, just a few releases, having encapsulated those 500 projects and really focusing on preserving them as best as possible.
Will: Art Blocks is in such a weird place. They're not really doing formal curated stuff, but then they have whatever their new version of Playground is — in theory anyone who's worked on those contracts before can, without permission, come publish work there. But without the prestige of being curated, or even the tier just below curated —
Dragons — William Mapan
McLlama: Art Blocks Presents.
Will: Right, whatever their second tier of curation was — when it got reduced to "this is an open platform, but just for artists who've been picked before," they weren't selling out. Some things sold, but some really didn't perform well. It's the exact same problem fx(hash) had: the whole community, artists and collectors alike, turned toward wanting curation — not even necessarily the marketing behind it. I don't think someone buys a release from Verse because the marketing is so good. I think they buy it because they like the artist, and because the platform is staking its reputation on them, saying "this is good, come buy this." That's why it's priced where it is, and why it gets all this space. You've collected on Verse — how do you feel about them being one of the last really curated experiences out there?
McLlama: All I can say is I've really enjoyed the projects Verse has put out. I'm an Erik Swahn fan, and there have been several great releases there. I love how they bridge the gap between the digital and the physical. You'd maybe suggested this is turning more toward traditional art galleries and less decentralized, but I don't think that's it. I think platforms like Verse that do both are great for onboarding new collectors and giving more legitimacy to what we're doing. If real people are showing up and viewing this digital artwork, that's awesome. I don't see it as a long-term shift toward traditional art — I see it as a cool way to release cool art, and they've done a great job with that.
Will: I've thought about it two ways. I feel like there should be an open platform somewhere — for someone like me, who decides they want to get into coding and makes a project that's not amazing, but wants to put it up and say "I published something." Verse was never going to do that, and I've never been on Art Blocks, and I don't have the technical chops to run my own website and spin up my own contract. So there's a use case for something like the old Hic Et Nunc — a punk, DIY platform where anyone can publish. But it doesn't feel economically viable now unless you accept it's a one-person operation, where some months you make $100 and some months $10,000 — a hobby with upside, basically.
McLlama: A few thoughts. One, Verse had an announcement recently about going fully open.
Will: They did.
Dragons — William Mapan
McLlama: I have no idea what's going on there, but they seem to be moving that way. And there are other little platforms popping up, like Bootloader — kind of like early fx(hash) in terms of functionality. So I don't think that opportunity is gone for someone who just wants to dabble and mint something and see what happens.
Will: I don't understand Verse. They've been expanding their contracts out to more galleries, going through branding and rebranding — "we're the gallery," then "Solos is the gallery," then there are other curators, then those curators aren't part of us anymore, but they can still... Lonli's no longer there, but he's spun up his new thing, the garden, and his first project is of course on Verse with their contracts. Their whole identity and role has been all over the place. We've interviewed Jamie probably three times over the course of this show, and I feel like he's always been skeptical of the open-platform idea, because you want your brand to have some kind of premium, some prestige. The second you let anyone jump on the platform and muck it up with random sketches, you run into the same problem fx(hash) struggled with: how do you let anyone publish, but also elevate and curate the projects you think will actually make money? OBJKT has gone through that too — people salty about never being on the front page after publishing there for three years. The whole politics of who gets front-page notoriety.
I have no idea what their plan is. I'm super curious to see how it plays out.
McLlama: I want to shout out OBJKT, because in the midst of a potential fx(hash) shutdown, having that extra layer of security in terms of preservation is really reassuring. They've done an excellent job — I like using the platform more than OpenSea, honestly. They do a combination of things, like drops with Casey Reas — long-form generative art dropped on OBJKT. The more options and stable platforms we have, the better. OBJKT has been really reassuring throughout this turmoil.
Will: Bootloader is a side project from them too, and they finally added p5 and JavaScript support — it was originally just SVG and native HTML stuff. It's cool that they're around, but they're still Tezos-only. One reason artists left fx(hash) for other platforms is they felt collector demand to put their art on ETH, or they'd been blessed with an Art Blocks curation and now had this whole ETH collector base. You can't drag them back to Tezos, not in great enough numbers. So fx(hash) probably thought, we need to support this other chain — and I don't imagine Bootloader or OBJKT will ever cross over.
McLlama: That'd be wild. I don't fault fx(hash) for wanting to move toward ETH and Base — that's how they got that Coinbase venture funding. It's unfortunate there wasn't a breakthrough moment where a big project generated a lot of hype. But it's also kind of funny, as someone who loves Tezos and Tezos art, to see that pretty much all the volume now is Tezos legacy grails — partially thanks to people like me.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: I'm so tempted to talk to you about Pokémon because of my history with it. But I also want to ask, since you've been in the crypto space for so long — this last cycle felt so weak. Not just that it never really shifted to NFTs, which sucked for all of my art, but I held Bitcoin and ETH since 2020 and missed the window to sell in 2021. Then I just held. I finally got out close enough-ish to the top this cycle, but still nowhere near what anyone doing the charts and cycle theory would have predicted. You've been here one cycle longer than me, maybe one and a half. What do you feel about the space in general — how PvP it's become, how we keep getting these shallower and shallower cycles? Do you hold out hope for the tech, or as a speculative asset at all?
McLlama: Longer term, I'm always a long-term Bitcoin bull. All I hold right now is Bitcoin and NFTs — I've completely liquidated all my meme tokens, whatever you want to call them. I don't hold any ETH, I don't hold any Tezos long term. Bitcoin is digital gold, and that thesis still holds up.
I think it actually makes sense to see shorter, less explosive market cycles as the market matures — it's just completely different now. We have ETFs and so many ways to invest in Bitcoin, and naturally it's going to get less volatile as it matures. That said, we did see some crazy subcycles — the Solana meme token trading was pretty insane, rivaling anything I've ever been a part of in crypto. It was short-lived, of course.
For another NFT cycle to happen requires a convergence of a lot of different factors timed correctly within the crypto market cycle, global politics, all of it. I can't say what's going to happen, and it is disappointing not to see a real NFT bull run. But I still think if you're buying quality art with historical value, you'll do fine in the long run.
Will: How much more buying do you think you'll personally do — Erik Swahn aside? Are there other things you're still targeting, or just watching and putting in offers? We've moved down probably 90% twice on a lot of these projects, so there's always the potential to go down again — what's $30 today could be $15 in a year. Your Farbteiler collection is pretty complete — you've got all your monos, so many awesome ones. I was actually looking at your stuff because I minted a mono myself, and I was disappointed, so I flipped it — I loved the project, loved the colors, but got this weird mono piece. I wondered if you'd incidentally ended up with mine, but it wasn't — I think I had a green one. There's probably more stuff on Verse you could still get from him or other artists. Is there a point where you'll say, I've got enough of the old stuff — or if it goes down 90% again, are you straight back in the Farbteiler zone?
Farbteiler — Erik Swahn
McLlama: If it goes down 90% again, I'll be buying more Garden, Monoliths. But yeah, I still have a few goals with the Farbs. Obviously I'm extremely happy with what I have, but I've got a couple more specific targets. I have the primary and secondary color wheel for mono outputs — I'm just a few away from getting all 12 colors, including tertiary.
Will: Oh, okay. I didn't know you were going to say that.
McLlama: That's one goal. It'll require some outreach, since these wallets are hard to track down and there are really only a couple mono outputs for each color. It might happen. It would be incredible — the fact that the algorithm produced mono outputs across all 12 colors is already amazing, and to be able to collect all of them would be pretty insane.
I'm still interested in more Dragons and Garden, Monoliths, to be honest. They're the top dogs, and the more grail hunting I do, the more laser-focused I've become on those collections. And to go back to the Pokémon cards — I've been trimming my collection down. Obviously I love these cards, but do I love them more than a Garden, Monolith? Usually the answer is no. So I'll be selling more Pokémon cards regardless of whether that market has topped. I enjoy setting off the sales bot in the Discord, and I think it'll happen a few more times. I don't want to say too much, since there are some specific pieces I have my eye on.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: No, don't —
McLlama: What do you think of that anonymous wallet that's been scooping up dragons and gardens for high prices?
Will: I've noticed it — I think there was a 15K Tez sale of a dragon that wasn't even—
McLlama: It was a nice dragon, but not that nice, to be fair.
Will: Right, not a paper one or a gold one or any of the other really rare, scarce ones. I think you got your gold one for like 4K or 5K Tez?
McLlama: 6K Tez. The one I call the ancient dragon I got for, I think, 5.5. It's interesting — I actually looked into their wallet. They'd just been holding around 40,000 Tez for a year or two, did nothing with it, then suddenly started buying.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: Did they have any other art, or was it just a dormant Tez-only wallet?
McLlama: They sent Tezos from Bybit, collected staking rewards, and did absolutely nothing else until recently.
Will: Maybe someone who lost their keys for an extended period. Who knows.
McLlama: I like the pieces they've selected. It almost seems like they're making a statement — like these prices are all a joke.
Will: Let me see what else they have. Their fx(hash) wallet is only two dragons and two Garden, Monoliths.
Dragons — William Mapan
McLlama: They did also buy a rare tezard.
Will: Interesting — definitely a wallet to keep track of, see if they keep buying. I do want to ask you about some Pokémon stuff. Aside from collecting when I was young, I'm much closer to Magic: The Gathering on the TCG side. Magic's been around since 1991, '92, huge history. I don't know if you play, but I'm sure you know what a Black Lotus is just from being a CCG collector.
McLlama: I've heard of it, yeah.
Will: Right, everyone just knows it — these iconic cards that have escaped their core collector base. What drives value in Magic, almost exclusively besides rarity and age, is playability — is the card actually good, is it used in decks that can win? Historically it's not about, oh, this is a foil version of that. My impression from all the Pokémon content I get on TikTok now is that it's driven far more by aesthetics — the various tiers of rarity, foiling, and alternate art. So what's your background in Pokémon? I assume you played back in the day, and I'm guessing we're similarly aged. How do you approach collecting — do you trust your eye to spot a cool card that people are going to want? What's the driving thing behind that?
McLlama: Entirely aesthetics, for me. The Pokémon cards I bought in 2024 were almost exclusively vintage Japanese cards — partly because they're so much cheaper than the American first editions, like 100 times cheaper, and the holographic quality is actually better. They're less scarce and easier to grade, so naturally they're less valuable. My thesis was simple: I love these, I think they look better than the American versions, and I'm just going to hoard them. It played out well — the vintage Japanese cards went up about 5 to 10x over a matter of weeks earlier in the year.
So for me it's all about aesthetics and rarity. I do keep track of the pop report — I also collect PSA 10 graded cards, so that population report is really helpful information when you're collecting. It has nothing to do with playability. I dabbled with that as a kid, going to Toys "R" Us, battling kids, trading and whatnot.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: Does playability even matter in the high-end collector hobby? So many of these cards, it seems like people are either sitting on sealed product or cracking packs and grading them. It feels like a nightmare scenario if a genuinely desirable card is also competitively good — more of them end up in slabs than in decks. Do the designers have some awareness of this, making sure the chase cards aren't the playable ones, so people can actually still play?
McLlama: Good question. For the modern stuff, I don't know. The modern cards have crazy designs, very busy artwork and textures — cool, but as far as value goes, I don't think playability is strongly associated with value from what I can tell.
Will: Gotcha. The pop report thing is such a fascinating collector metric to latch onto. I've seen people say the Japanese 10s are almost worth less because the population is too high — the cards are better made, condition is better, so ironically it's harder to stand out, versus the "trashier" US cards where it's harder to get a 10 because they're misaligned or have edge wear right out of the pack. It's interesting that these core platforms own and control this information, and often they're the ones doing the grading too — there's so much grading paranoia and conspiracy around it. Did you buy those Japanese cards raw and grade them yourself, or buy them already graded?
McLlama: Always graded, on eBay. That's really the only resource I use for buying and selling.
Will: Do you buy into any of the skepticism around the grading companies? I'm sure you've seen those videos where someone cracks a card, resubmits it, and it comes back two grades higher. What's your take on that?
McLlama: There's been some pretty crazy situations. I don't look too much into it. There's a bias toward newer certifications — cards graded more recently tend to face more stringent standards than those graded years ago. So there's a real bias there, but I don't dig too deep into it, honestly. If it's a 10, it's a 10, and the Pokémon market is actually fairly liquid — you can move these things in a matter of days if you want to. The PSA 10 is respected despite the inconsistencies people point out. That's just going to happen. It's impossible to avoid entirely — there are some egregious examples for sure, but I don't look too much into it.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: Gotcha — you got in last year, already 10x'd, and you're just selling and buying art without following the controversy. Do you see yourself continuing with the hobby, or will you keep the ones you like and call it there?
McLlama: I have a binder full of graded PSA 10 cards, and I've been trimming it down as the price goes up, trying to decide what the core collection is that I actually care about. I'm getting closer to that. At a certain point I'll have to decide whether I keep selling or stop, and I think we're reaching that point. But the 30th anniversary set is coming out soon, and that might generate more buzz and another vintage pump. Who knows? If things go really crazy, I'll sell almost everything for sure.
Will: Did you play as a kid? Was there nostalgia for you, or did you get in for other reasons?
McLlama: I mostly collected. I wasn't much of a player, as far as decks and whatnot — mostly just collected for fun.
Will: When you decided to jump in in 2024, was it purely the arbitrage thing you noticed between Japanese and American markets? Just, "this is too wide of a gap, there's too much potential"?
McLlama: There was a lot of buzz around Pokémon in general — it all came full circle. I did start buying the modern cards, but that felt kind of corny. Then I started looking at the prices of cards that were legendary to me as a kid, and they were so cheap. It wasn't a calculation of "this will be a 10x" — it was just, wow, these are cheap and I want to buy them. And it played out really well.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: What you just said is one of the things that informed my more recent collecting of vinyl records. I got back into collecting vinyl in a real way about two and a half years ago. I'd go on Discogs, the main site for trading vinyl records — it's also the database of everything — and find a record I wanted. You'd see the original pressing and all the subsequent represses, and on some of these, the price difference between an original '70s pressing and a 2025 repress is only about $20.
That didn't make sense to me as a lifelong collector of various things. Sure, there were points in history when they were printing huge quantities of records because it was basically the only format people could get music on. But that's when I decided to start collecting only first pressings, because if I want my collection to hold value moving forward, I can't just be buying represses at Walmart and Target — even if the music sounds mostly the same.
There's a disconnect in the hobby. And of course, it became a way for me to spend a lot more money in some cases — but that's always how it is.
McLlama: When you find that lane — something undervalued that you also appreciate and enjoy looking at, or in your case, whatever the aesthetic value is to you — that's a good collecting opportunity. It's apparent when you're in that situation.
Will: I do play them, though there's some I probably shouldn't. The whole slabbing thing hasn't come over to records in a big way yet, partly because so much of the hobby for people is also about their system, fidelity, and sound quality — I don't have the space or money for that. For a lot of those folks, owning an original pressing and putting it under plastic means you can't play the record, and you can't demonstrate it's a nice copy. How else do you show it's in mint condition?
But I have seen people like Steve Aoki slabbing music media they collect, so there are people on the edge of it starting to do that. I'd be curious what the hobby looks like in five or ten years. There's one label or distributor now that, in addition to retail, sells pre-graded copies on their website — like fifty slabbed 10s of the new Taylor Swift album. Getting a 10 in the wild is probably difficult. It's funny to see — it's the Pokémon-ification of other hobbies. They see the premium out there and know it could come over. It'll be an interesting day when that happens.
Dragons — William Mapan
I want to jump back to Verse real quick. We talked a bit about their curated stuff and how they might be changing the platform — you've collected some of their most recent release, the Brainrot stuff. It's been interesting seeing them succeed in the PFP space by hybridizing it with art, between that and the Tabor PFP. I minted a few of the Tabor ones because they were free to me, given how they dripped those out, but I didn't mint any of the Brainrot ones. It's clearly attracted a lot of new people to their platform who are more than happy to come in and complain in the Discord.
McLlama: Oh, the Discord was a mess.
Will: Yeah, lots of green-leaf users complaining. But is this the game now — do you need the candy to support the platform?
McLlama: I don't know. For both of those projects, I was just so excited to see a 10K PFP project mint out. That's such a foreign concept — that many editions. I haven't witnessed that in so long. I also love long-form AI, which is a whole separate topic I could talk about for thirty minutes. It was just fun to mint, cool to see it succeed and the floor price go up. The Human Resources project in particular has some very devoted collectors doing the full role-playing thing. When I see those opportunities, I'm still a crypto degen at the end of the day — I'm going to spam the mint button regardless of what I think of the art specifically. But yeah, really cool to see.
Will: Did you ever collect on Emprops?
McLlama: Yes — and actually, I dropped a few projects of my own on Emprops.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: Oh, did you?
McLlama: That's how into it I got. It's not something I expect people to notice, but having done that with AI — prompting, inputting images, then seeing the results after people mint and thinking, "that wasn't quite random enough, those weren't quite the outputs I wanted" — it gave me more respect for generative artists and other types of artists too. It's hard to get a set of outputs as diverse as you want within your parameters. I don't know if Emprops is still up and running, but yeah.
Will: It was a very interesting platform. I collected a little off there and tried to figure out how to use their tools to create something myself — every time I see something new I try to figure it out and see if I can release something. I was never able to get their syntax working in a way that made sense to me, and then I had a baby, so I gave up on it. But I thought it was really cool, and we talked to those guys when it launched.
McLlama: I think that platform was revolutionary. It may have just been a little early in the bear market, but long-form AI is such a cool topic.
Will: The Brainrots really weren't interesting to me aesthetically or thematically, but I know artists who've dabbled in it and their feedback was, "it's just so well done" — to do 10,000 of those and have them all look —
McLlama: Ten thousand is a lot.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: Right. So there must be a lot of craft to that, even if I think they're just kind of goofy.
McLlama: I can't say they resonate with me super well, but still really fun.
Will: I think the Human Resources one is pretty interesting. I was skeptical until I listened to Tabor talk about it more. I've just been holding the ones I've got — I know he's an artist they're betting big on long-term with the platform.
McLlama: So hey, it's my PFP on Twitter. I found the one I like and I'm supporting it.
Will: Is there anything else you want to touch on before we wrap up? Anything we missed?
McLlama: We touched on everything — long-form AI, Pokémon, my obsessiveness with Zancan and Erik Swahn and those collections.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: I feel like we got through a lot. It's been great chopping it up with another collector and talking about the space. I hope we get some good news from fx(hash) at some point — that would be ideal.
McLlama: Just to add on to that — if fx(hash) were to shut down, I don't know if OBJKT would perpetuate the existing listings or not. But if they don't, I think that would actually be really interesting: clear the order books, have a fresh supply and demand. Not necessarily a bad thing in the long run.
Will: You'd have to think a lot of the listings on fx(hash) haven't been touched in years.
McLlama: Some of the ones that got bought recently were actually listed years ago.
Will: Back when Tezos might have been a much different price.
McLlama: Yeah, it's interesting.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: Well, we're still here, still watching and lurking and making these episodes from time to time. Thankful to folks like you who are still happy to come on and talk with us.
McLlama: Thanks for having me. I hope my rambling was somewhat entertaining.
Will: It's great. Best of luck with your continued collecting and the Pokémon stuff — and if you ever get into records, hit me up, I'll give you some ideas of where to start. That was McLlama, everyone. Let me plug your Twitter real quick.
McLlama: My tag is Pompous LL.
Will: Pompous LL. Wait, maybe we should close on this — where'd the McLlama name come from?
McLlama: Great question. Back in 2017, everyone on crypto Twitter was basically some sort of animal — you had Wassis, some unidentified animal-creature things. I started out as the Pompous Llama; that's how I created the account. It was a real-life nickname someone had passively given me, and I thought it was funny. It was too long to type as a Twitter tag, so it became Pompous LL instead of Pompous Llama. Then the bear market happened and people started putting McDonald's hats on their PFPs — the joke being that we're all going to need a job flipping burgers — and I turned into McLlama. That's how it started, and it's just the name people know me by.
Dragons — William Mapan
Will: Throw him a follow @PompousLL — we'll put that down below, and we'll link to your Raster collection too so people can browse it and see all the Farbteilers and the other great stuff you've collected. I scrolled through, and you've got stuff from all eras of fx(hash), plus a bunch of A.I. and other digital art. I saw some Culture Hacker in there too.
McLlama: Yeah, I like glitch art as well.
Will: And some John Gerard stuff. You've definitely been around for a minute collecting all this. That's it for this one, everyone. I hope you enjoyed it. Big thanks to McLlama for coming on and talking to us about art.
McLlama: And thanks to everyone who's still active on fx(hash). I see all of you in the Discord reacting to purchases — everyone who's still active right now is a legend.
Will: Legendary status achieved. Well, thanks again for coming on. We'll be back soon-ish with another episode. Later, everyone.
McLlama: Thanks again for having me.
Farbteiler — Erik Swahn
Speaker A: All right. Hello and welcome everyone to another episode of Waiting to Be Signed. We've got a special interview episode for you all today. It's a collector interview. We're joined by McLlama, who you might know from the FX Hash sales feed mostly, and also his Twitter account, which I actually should have had it open because your name isn't @McLlama on Twitter, but we'll plug that in a moment. Hey man, thanks for coming on the show.
Speaker B: Yeah, thanks for having me. It's an honor. I've been looking through some of the episodes that I missed in the recent months. And yeah, I mean, you've interviewed my favorite artists and some really cool collectors. And so yeah, happy to be here.
Speaker A: Oh, nice. Yeah. What stood out to you on the artist side?
Speaker B: Well, Erik Swahn and Zancan, for sure. I would say they're my favorite artists. Yeah. So I had actually listened to the Erik Swahn one previously, but I think the Zancan interview was somewhat recent. So it was good to catch up on that. Yeah.
Speaker A: Recent in terms of the episode numbers, cuz we've reduced the number of episodes we've done a lot. So it's probably not that far back. But yeah, let's kick this thing off and I'll ask you of course to introduce yourself however you like and tell us a bit about your background and collecting and how you came to start collecting NFTs and in particular generative art?
Speaker B: My general personal background is I work in sort of a data engineer type role, so I'm on the computer all the time. So that naturally works out pretty well with the collecting. I'm able to, you know, keep tabs on things really easily. But yeah, I mean, as far as getting into the NFT art, I really have no formal experience in art whatsoever. It was all through crypto, as I'm sure is a common story. I kind of got into crypto around 2017, you know, bought the top of that first cycle and have experienced full market cycles, you could say. And the same with my collecting for, you know, my entire life, you know, from Pokémon to NFTs, I've been through market cycles. And I used to also trade high-end basketball trading cards. And so I've experienced the pain of selling grails too early many times. So I think that's a large part of my sort of conviction with collecting these days. And NFTs are just kind of a natural thing. Um, it really feels the same, you know, even when you're collecting physical collectibles, you're on the computer all the time browsing eBay, browsing social media. So it, it really just feels natural to me. And yeah, it's been a really fun time. And this is one of those collectible categories, if you will, that just I don't see ever leaving. You know, I might sell physical trading cards and kind of get out of that for a while, but I'll never be able to sell all my NFTs. So I'm here for the long haul, for sure.
Speaker A: If you look at the offers in fx hash, you might think there's some stuff that you're definitely never going to be able to sell. Yeah, like, for sure. For sure. Like, I did a little bit of selling recently, just small stuff, 3 tests, 5 tests here and there just to clear out the wallet a little bit. And it's like pretty dire out there. But as far as your collecting, so did you, if you came in through crypto, did you start with the NFTs on like the PFP side and then cross into art through Art Blocks? Like, was that your path?
Speaker B: Yeah, kind of the typical path, I guess. Started out kind of minting the hype PFPs I saw on my Twitter feed, most of which are, I mean, all of them are pretty much completely dead at this point. Did dabble with Art Blocks. I think I was late to Art Blocks. So, you know, I was minting factory stuff and really didn't have the funds to collect anything serious at the time. Despite that being kind of the peak of the bull run where I did have, you know, the most crypto of my life. You know, like most collectors, you tend to come in at the top.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: And that's, that's what happened to me. Yeah.
Speaker A: Well, let me ask you a little bit about your philosophy for collecting and, well, actually let's start with this. Like, so I feel like the cohort of people who are still here and collecting art, and I, like yourself, like I did not come into crypto thinking that I was gonna get really interested in art, you know, and still be engaged in doing this stuff. It was very accidental just finding Tezos through someone I knew. Finding Hic Et Nunc and just minting a few things, cuz I had this Tez and I didn't know what else to do with it. And I thought that was cool. And then obviously fx hash comes along and like, I guess swept up in the Discord and the community and just waiting up all night for mints and all, all that fun stuff from back in 2021. So for yourself, I mean, what was it for you about generative art and I guess art in general that struck a chord and got you interested in collecting beyond just speculation?
Speaker B: So starting off on Hic Et Nunc, it really felt just kind of raw. And I don't know, there was a certain aesthetic to it. It was really basic. You just had to browse the feed of random art and there was something about it that just was really enjoyable. And, you know, I did find that I gravitated towards certain collections that I kept running into and eventually became some of the biggest collectors of some artists there. And I think, you know, when fxhash came out, that's when the addictive part of my personality came out. It was like ripping packs of Pokémon cards. You don't know what you're gonna get. Yeah. Get. And I think that's really fun. And I still do. And so yeah, when fxhash came out, I was kind of doing the, you know, oh, I'm going to mint 2 and then sell 1 and cover my cost basis. And that works for a while. But then you realize what you missed out on when it comes to the real grails. So I think I learned a lot through that. And I would say it was kind of after that initial rush, you know, months after, like months to a year or so after that fxhash rush that I really started to like connect with the projects. Like Farbteiler, for example, I just kept coming back to it and realized like, I want to hoard these. Like, it's not enough to just have a few. So I developed these connections to certain projects. And, you know, from there, I think my feed just became purely art, really. Like, it went from crypto Twitter, you know, meme posting, whatever you want to call it, to, oh, wow, like most of my followers are artists and art collectors. So It was a lot of content to take in. And I think just over time, I've realized that I do actually genuinely connect with certain projects and artists, and it's more than just making a trade. So that's kind of how I reached that point.
Speaker A: Have you gone so far to the point of like getting, you know, prints and plots and like starting to arrange stuff around the house? Like, I remember when we talked to Eric, I was kind of trying to suss out from him, you know, like, For Farbteiler, was it something that was plottable, or have you ever experimented with that stuff? And I think he said he had some experiments that he is, you know, obviously never went on to sell. But for someone like you who maybe has so much of his work, I mean, do you have anything from Erik up on the wall or any other artists that you want to talk about?
Speaker B: Yeah, so as far as prints and plots go, I really value having that being gated by the artist. Like, I really want the signed print. I just don't, I don't want to print it myself. Just as someone who's historically collected physical things, I really value that it's like, there's a real physical connection. It's not to say that I'm against anyone printing stuff that they own. Like, that's awesome. That's just for me. It's like an additional layer to the collection, if you will. So yeah, I have a really cool plotted piece by Joanie Lemercier. And by the way, I also wanna say apologies if I mispronounce any artist names, collector names.
Speaker A: Mm-hmm.
Speaker B: All of this is in my head from this online world and I don't, I don't talk to people about this in real life very much, so apologies in advance for mispronouncing anything. But yeah, I have a really cool plotted piece from them. I got a print of one of my KGMs from Zancan and Yazid. So that's like a giant piece in my living room. I actually have a signed Ganbrood piece too, which is kind of rare. He doesn't do a lot of those. And yeah, a few, a few random plots here and there. I would say my physical collection is still pretty small, and especially with my recent pickups, I'm—
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: interested in getting more physical stuff. You can tell my room here is very barren. And that's kind of intentional, because I take work calls in this location. And so I just, I don't know, I don't like to open it up to conversation with random colleagues and acquaintances. But, um, yeah, I definitely want to keep growing that collection of the physical medium.
Speaker A: Cool. Right on. What is your philosophy now? I mean, I think for all of us who have come into NFTs, We all came into it with some level of like speculation and hype and hopes and dreams for where they might go. And perhaps you still have a long view that we're gonna get there. I'm totally undecided myself at this point on what the long view is, 'cause it's such a challenging time right now. But for your particular, like, let's say collector psychographic, how do you value the projects that you collect, the artists that you collect beyond just the aesthetic? Like, oh, I love, you know, I love Erik's work, or I love Zancan's work. You know, I remember there used to be a lot of discussions about being in the first 100 fxhash projects and the importance of that legacy and history there, or same thing with the early Art Blocks projects. I mean, a lot of the early AB stuff, you know, perhaps like Ringers and the Big Grails aside, a lot of the early stuff doesn't look that good to me anymore. It looks quite bad actually.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: But there was a time, and perhaps there are still some completionists out there who feel like You need to own those first X. So do you prescribe to any rules like that? Because I imagine obviously with things like Pokémon, right? Like, yeah, the vintageness of things does matter there beyond just the playability of a card necessarily. How do you think about it? How do you approach it?
Speaker B: Yeah, I wouldn't say I have any rules. There are times where I'm just browsing historic collections and I'm like, wow, this is one of the first 100 projects and this is really cool and I need to buy this. But I wouldn't say it's a rule or mindset that I intentionally have. I think obviously, it's really easy to just look at all-time volume as far as determining what the most important projects are. So that's an easy way to look at it. And yeah, I think it's like historic volume plus how you connect with the art. So like, it's not unique to say that Garden Monoliths are a grail, right? Like anyone could say that. But actually really looking at the collection and the depth of the outputs and getting into it has been something that I've enjoyed doing over the course of the last several years. And it's not just the historical pricing and volume, but really just looking at how I appreciate the art. So yeah, it's a combination of things. I would say I collect intuitively, or I like to think so anyways, in terms of market cycles and whatnot. But we really haven't had a market cycle with these pieces. So it's just really what I want to collect. Yeah.
Speaker A: So how do you feel long term? I mean, there were so many narratives, like we're gonna see the auction houses adopt And we did see that to a small degree, and we're going to see institutions adopt. And we've seen some high-profile donations and maybe even a few here and there purchases from museums, like into collections, but those did not seem like inciting events, right, that I think the community might've expected them to be in 2021. So do you hold out hope at all for like crossing into the mainstream more, be it either trad art or the other direction, which is like— Do we think it's just forget those institutions, crypto is not about that, we're going to scale crypto 100x from here. And these collectibles are going to be interesting in and of themselves when there's just that many more people who might want to collect this stuff?
Speaker B: I guess I don't know, I could see it being a combination of those ideally, right? I would love to see more institutional adoption and whatnot. But I think that's like really long-term horizon as far as any of those institutional investors are going to have long-term horizons, right? And I think a lot of the crypto market right now has shorter-term horizons, and that's why everyone is so frustrated. Get the NFT bull run this cycle and whatnot. And so I don't know exactly how it's going to play out, but I think there's a lot of opportunity seeing this price action, which is horrible and complete lack of liquidity and whatnot, seeing it as an opportunity to like really, as just a normal person, acquire these pieces that just 2 or 3 years ago would have been absolutely impossible to buy. as a normal person, right? Like the pink GM that I bought a month or so ago, for example, like that would have been unfathomable just 2 years ago for me. So I see it as an opportunity to kind of make your place in the history of whatever plays out. I can't tell you what's going to happen. But yeah, I see it as an opportunity. And it's, it's been really fun.
Speaker A: It was probably about 2 or 2 and a half years ago that Le Random acquired their pink GM, right? And it was a big deal. Because I think I can't remember what the USD equivalent was. But it was certainly $10,000 or tens of thousands. It was, it was quite expensive.
Speaker B: You might want to fact-check me, but I think it might have been over $100K.
Speaker A: Over $100K. I know they timed it very closely with the purchase of the RGB #1 also. So they definitely made their mark, like grabbing 2 keystone pieces from the fxhash history there. Anyone who was kind of building a collection 2 and a half years ago has got to be looking now and going like, wow, like imagine what we could have had. So yeah, I've browsed your collection a bit. Obviously you're very Erik Swahn heavy. And a lot of that increase has come from the recent activity as we've seen, like so many longtime collectors, for whatever reason, starting to divest, at least, you know, from fx hash, if not across all chains. So do you just kind of see this trend and decide like, now's the time, like I'm going to jump in because we're down 90% on this stuff? Or have you been slowly acquiring along the way? What inspired you to jump in now in all of this chaos?
Speaker B: I've been collecting the Farbs pretty heavily for the last few years. So that's kind of just a constant, I guess. You know, I could keep buying them, but at a certain point it gets ridiculous. But obviously recently I've been really just focused on, on the grails, right? Like the Garden Monoliths and the dragons and whatnot. And it's partially what you said about, yeah, the prices are down so much that it's very appealing to buy them right now. But it's also just the timing of my other market cycle that I've been participating in. So I actually did buy quite a few vintage Pokémon cards around 2024. So I was actually buying those more than I was buying NFTs at the time. And They did really, really well early this year. And so I started selling some of them and that's kind of been funding my, my grail purchases on FXHash. So it's kind of like life hands you this opportunity and the timing of things just makes sense. And I like the price of the art right now. And I got this liquidity that I can tap into now. And so it's a combination of things. Yeah, I think it's like just, just the fact that people are even listing these Grails is fortunate too, right? Yeah.
Speaker A: Do you give any thought or concern to the viability of like chains and stuff? Like, you know, I think for as long as we've been collecting on Tezos, there's always been FUD around the chain being a ghost chain, be, you know, a lot of ill will towards the founders. And I think the way they handled the ICO, that just never really— I think a lot of people forgot about it, but then kind of just the stink on it never really went away.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: Constantly expecting the chain to fail despite the fact that it's been around. I mean, you think about like the whole like Lindy idea, right? Like Tezos has been around for quite a while and is not earning any of that for whatever reason.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: At the same, same time now we're seeing people come in on the ETH side. Like, I'm sure you follow a lot of these ETH people, but like the Bankless folks, for example, have finally turned on ETH, right? And like sold all their ETH. And there's all this FUD around the foundation and the way they handled the L2s and They're cannibalizing their fees. So maybe a better way to phrase this is, have you put a lot of thought recently into preservation and like what happens with all of this stuff? Like, should a chain go down or should a platform, which we'll probably talk about soon, like fx hash go down? What is your approach to that stuff currently?
Speaker B: I guess I'll start by addressing the Tezos FUD thing. So I mean, as someone who's been in crypto since 2017, I can tell you that a lot of those crypto OGs who are really hating on Tezos right now, used to absolutely love it. Like in 2019, 2020, Tezos was all the hype and people were treating it as a real investment, right? And a lot of people got burned by the price action. Fundamentally, it is a really great blockchain and in some ways superior to Ethereum, I think. And I have absolutely no problem using it as a basic user. I love it. But I think that it just left a bad taste in, in those crypto OGs', you know, opinions. And That kind of perpetuated through the NFT cycle, I think. And then of course, everyone made millions of dollars on ETH and Art Blocks. And then it's like, well, look at Tezos, the price is just going down constantly. Why would I collect there? So it's just kind of elitist psychology combined with the fact that they at one time did actually like the chain. But now it's kind of an emotional thing, I think, for a lot of people. Do I fear that the blockchain will ever shut down? Probably not in the foreseeable future. No, I don't have any fear of that. But to transition to the next part of your question, yes, preservation has become extremely important, especially with the impending, if you will, shutdown of fxhash. Obviously, we don't know. But yeah, I mean, I wasn't really expecting that to happen so suddenly, right?
Speaker A: Mm-hmm.
Speaker B: Like, there was this several-week period where there was some bad news kind of lurking in the air, but no one knew what was going on, and there was no communication from the team. And so, Yeah, it can happen suddenly and you need to be ready for that. Have I done anything myself about it? No, but I've thought about it. But there are people like Raster came out immediately after that and said, hey, sign up, create an account, and we'll back up your art for you without— you know, it's not— they're not pinning the IPFS for you, but so it's not a complete redundancy. But, um, there are people who have been thinking about this seriously for years, so that gives me hope that Nothing is going to completely disappear.
Speaker A: Yeah, I noticed that Raster thing. I was like, this is brilliant. And of course I connected and I had connected to Raster a while ago, so I don't know if they had already done it for me, but it was awesome to see that like 90+% of my NFTs, like there were a few corner case ones probably from like Versum or some other defunct platforms that they weren't able to cover. But that was great to see. I, you know, obviously we haven't like battle tested that to see If I ever lose access to my fx hash account, 'cause the platform, like, I have no idea what the experience will be like viewing that stuff. Someone who we've always talked about having on the show is like Regina Hersani. If you know her, she works at the, um, I probably messed up her name, but she does like digital preservation. You can find great videos of her on YouTube talking about the challenges of it, not just through NFTs, but dating back to like digital art.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: From, you know, like the '80s, '70s, and how challenging it is to make sure that it actually can still exist and live in a way that was how the artist intended it to. Not just like in a bare bones, like, oh, we still have the file, but like, no, it's like displayed on the right machines. Right. And can actually, the colors will match and things like that. We would never think about in 2021, like collecting on fxhash or Art Blocks. Right.
Speaker B: Right. Yeah. It's more fragile than I thought. Like, even some of the on-chain stuff on fx hash sounds like it's more of a headache than the IPFS projects from some conversations that I've seen. So it's definitely concerning. Am I panicking? No, for sure. Definitely not.
Speaker A: I have my fingers crossed that no matter what goes down, Ciphrd will not leave us completely screwed. Like, it seems like he's still plugging away and If for whatever reason they just are gonna be put in a position to shut down the platform, I hope and perhaps expect that that might be an unfair word, that he'll come up with something for us, right? To make sure at least things still function in some, in some fashion. But yeah, let's talk about fx hash a little bit because it's been such a crazy few months, but also in a way a crazy 2 years being a show that like primarily covered it and trying to figure out everything that's going on with them and all their pivots. Like I shared some notes with you in advance and I was like, they moved to ETH, they moved to Base, they announced a kind of curated program called Vertex that had one release and then they never did anything with it. And then obviously like past things like params and fx and now OpenForm and the fx hash token. So you've been here the whole time collecting, engaging. What's your holistic take on the history of the platform? And, or if you wanna start with like the most more recent stuff with the tokens, like wherever you wanna start, like I'm down to talk about all of it.
Speaker B: Over-engineering has been one of my fears for the platform for the last couple years, really. It wasn't just the recent art coin thing. I do feel like creating novelty was kind of prioritized over doing more of a curated approach and getting really big projects to mint on there, right? Because we had the big grails, and then after that, the artists that really succeeded kind of moved on to different platforms and blockchains. So I did fear about the over-engineering thing, definitely. I will say more recently, you know, I felt that there was a bit much to drop art coins and open form at the same time. It was Ciphrd's project, right? The open form project that kind of unveiled the whole art coin thing, right?
Speaker A: Yeah. Genomes, right?
Speaker B: Oh no, this was after Genomes. This was—
Speaker A: What was the more recent one called?
Speaker B: Generations.
Speaker A: Generations. Okay.
Speaker B: Yeah. So it was fully open form, meaning unlimited number of iterations, and you could also evolve your outputs and mutate them and create new outputs after you had minted it. And to me, that technology-wise and art-wise is cool, but I think it totally removes the scarcity and the value aspect of the art as a collector, right? Like, why would I put any significant amount of money into minting something that I can change after I mint it, and then there's an unlimited number of outputs, right?
Speaker A: Hmm.
Speaker B: So I thought it was really cool, but it kind of removes the financial aspect of it completely. And then simultaneously, you're dropping art coins, which has nothing to do with art, and it's all financial, all about community and cult followings, right? And I just think that that combination didn't quite land right for me, at least. So that was a little bit kind of weak. Like, if they had come out with, you know, art coins, and then I'm just going to use an example, like Zancan dropped a really cool project with the art coin. dropping the same day, it could have generated quite a lot of buzz. So I felt like the release kind of fell flat. There was a period where I still believed in the concept, you know, the fxhash token in particular was promising. I mean, we saw— I actually took note of this— the Zora token went to $450 million market cap.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: I think fxhash peaked at $15 million. So like the potential that was there for the fxhash token was so great. And I really thought that like, yeah, I could see fxhash token going to $100 million easily, Right. And it just didn't happen. I thought it was going to for a while there for sure. And it just didn't happen. So that was disappointing. And then from there, it was kind of just, there was no momentum at that point. Crypto was kind of starting the bear market from the highs we saw. And obviously NFTs were not doing any better. So a lot of it is just, yeah, it didn't catch the hype for whatever reason. And that was kind of the window of opportunity was that 6-month period where Base memes were pumping and Zora was pumping and fxhash seemed natural and it just didn't happen. So yeah, that's kind of my take on the situation and how I perceived it.
Speaker A: My only answer is that fxhash made the mistake of launching with too much of a product and actually being like, no, you're going to go here and you're going to collect real art and you're going to explore it. And it's not going to just be you click a link on Twitter to some meme and you go and you just like YOLO into it and then sell it 2 hours later. Right. Like they were actually trying to create something. that was too hard in both senses of the word. Like, it was like a hard use case, but also like hard to use compared to other, other ways. Like, if you're gonna go speculate in coins, why go through all the trouble of like understanding the art and the artist? You can just go follow big meme accounts or whatever, however people found whatever they're gonna buy and so on, right?
Speaker B: Yeah. And I think ultimately, they found that while the people who were interested in using the platform weren't, at this time, speculative investors, they actually did want to mint cool art. And There was just this disconnect the entire time where the user experience was getting worse because, you know, the art coins complicated things. And whatever cabal overlords there are decided to not pump the tokens, right? Yeah, it just didn't work out. Yeah.
Speaker A: I don't know if you listened to the episodes we did kind of around it. We did an episode with Cypher because it was obviously just such a big moment for them. And, you know, they were very candid, like, if this doesn't work, the platform's in a lot of trouble. This is it.
Speaker B: Mm-hmm.
Speaker A: You know, which I was, I kind of suspected, but was surprised that they would actually admit to that on the episode. And it kind of made sense to me though, from a career perspective for an artist, like in my mind, like thinking back, if someone like Zancan, like if in 2021 or early 2020 or late 2020, even this whole art coin thing was there, like the idea of having a career coin where the supply constantly goes down and every time you release something, And it doesn't necessarily have to be OpenForm, but like, right, like it kind of makes sense if you could go back in time and launch it then. But as a Hail Mary move for a platform and also expecting them to pair it with OpenForm, which is this new kind of discipline, very few of the artists who did release that way, I think, really pulled it off well.
Speaker B: Mm-hmm.
Speaker A: It just felt tough. And then when you don't have a follow-up quickly, you just see the price action and the volume stagnate on those tokens because Once all the natural minting is done, then all that's left is to buy and sell the token and do nothing else with it. And you're waiting and waiting and waiting. And like, I think we only saw one or two artists ever even create a follow-up project that like used their same coin and just, it's a thing that needed years of time to prove itself out. And crypto doesn't have the time for that. And the platform didn't have that time either.
Speaker B: Yeah. I mean, that's the risk you take getting into that territory. It's as far as crypto cycles, you know, many cycles within a bull run happen really fast and Once you lose that momentum, it's kind of over.
Speaker A: What do you think about their more recent ideas around opening up the platform, doing a DAO? Are you fully out of fx hash, like fxh, I should say? Like, I'm sure you got like a decent chunk in airdrop.
Speaker B: Yeah, I sold a little bit of my allocation at first. I think I held most of it. I think what I have now is worth like $100 or $200. But, um, I don't know, I've never really seen the DAO thing play out. I think that's a great concept. I guess I don't really have an opinion on it. I really would like to see, personally, assuming that there's going to be no miracle funding coming in, which there might be. I mean, they've been talking about something, but I'd like to see them pivot more towards preserving the art and enabling the marketplace to persist. I think it kind of maintains that legacy, right? Because it's— I mean, FXHash is such a significant chapter of generative art and maintaining that platform in some degree.
Speaker A: Mm-hmm.
Speaker B: No matter what, is what I want to see, whatever that means. I don't know about the technical details and whatnot of what that would require. It seems like they need to trim down their infrastructure costs quite a bit for anything to be possible.
Speaker A: I mean, obviously it would be awesome if they could have the platform persist in some way. I think they were kind of floating, like, obviously keep secondary going because that's probably the only place they're really making much revenue these days, if they're making any. You know, I guess kind of the idea was perhaps like you could do some curated stuff and it would just be like 1 or 2 or 3 releases a year. And then that way they keep their costs down because they're not constantly having people putting up like—
Speaker B: that's what Art Blocks is doing right now, right? Like, if I understand correctly, doing just a few releases, but they've kind of encapsulated that 500 projects and really wanted to focus on preserving those as best as possible.
Speaker A: Yeah. It feels like Art Blocks is in such a weird place because yeah, they're not really doing formal curated stuff, but then they have whatever their new version of Playground is. So like in theory, anyone who has worked on those contracts before can, without permission, come and publish work there. But I think that they had this issue that without the prestige of being curated or even being, um, what was the one just below curated that they did, like, where it was still selected?
Speaker B: Art Blocks Presents.
Speaker A: Yeah, whatever their, their second tier of curation was. When it was reduced down to like, this is an open platform, but just for artists who have been picked before. They weren't selling out. Some things sold out, but some things really did not perform well. So it's the exact same problem that FX Hash had, which is like, it just feels like the whole community, artists and collectors both turned towards being curated, getting some kind of, not even necessarily the marketing behind them. 'Cause like, I don't know that I would say like someone might buy a release from Verse, for example, because the marketing was so good. I think they're buying it because they like the artist and they like that the platform is like staking like a bit of reputation on them and saying like, this is good, right? Come buy this. And that's why it's the price point it is. And that's why we're giving it all this space. So I know you've collected on Verse, like, how do you kind of feel about them being the last, at least as far as I guess there's also, there's one other platform, but like one of the last, like really curated experiences out there?
Speaker B: All I can say is like, I've really enjoyed the projects that Verse have put out. You know, obviously I'm an Erik Swahn fan and several really good releases there. And I love how they're bridging that gap between the digital and the physical. I think you had maybe alluded to, is this turning more towards traditional art galleries and less decentralized? And I don't think it's that. I think that platforms like Verse that do both is great to onboard new collectors and kind of give more legitimacy to what we're doing. Like, if you have real people showing up and viewing this digital artwork, it's awesome, right? Like, so I don't see it as like a long-term shift towards traditional art necessarily or anything like that. I just see it as A cool way to release cool art. And they've done a great job with that.
Speaker A: I've kind of thought about it 2 ways. Like, I feel like there should be an open platform somewhere. And I would love for it to work for like anyone who's maybe someone like me who maybe decided I want to get into coding and like, I make a project that's like not, not amazing, but I want to put it up there and I want to be able to like say like I published something. And I know like Verse was never going to do that. And like, I've never been on Art Blocks. I'm never gonna be able to put it there. And I don't have the technical chops to like run my own website and spin up my own contract. So I feel like there is a use case and like a need for almost like the Hic Et Nunc thing, like a very like punk DIY platform to exist where anyone can publish stuff. But there just doesn't feel like now, this doesn't feel like it's economically viable unless you just are willing to accept that it's like a one-person thing. You're going to be the one person who does it and maybe some months you'll make $100 and some months you'll make $10,000 and you can't be all in on it beyond that, right? Beyond almost like a hobby with upside.
Speaker B: Yeah. So a few thoughts. Well, one, Verse had an announcement recently about something about going fully open, right?
Speaker A: They did.
Speaker B: Yeah. I have no idea what's going on there, but yeah, they're moving more towards that, it seems like. And then, yeah, I mean, there's other little platforms popping up like Bootloader, right? It's kind of like early fx hash in terms of functionality. So I don't think that opportunity is gone, you know, as someone who just wants to dabble and mint something and see what happens.
Speaker A: Yeah, I don't understand the Verse. Like, I know that they've been expanding their contracts out to like more galleries, and they've kind of gone through like branding and rebranding of like, we're the gallery, and now actually we're like, Solos is the gallery, and then there's like other curators, and actually no, now those curators aren't a part of us, but they can still You know, Lonli's no longer there, but now he's spun up his new thing, The Garden.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: And his first project's of course on Verse with their contracts. So it's like their whole kind of identity and role in that way has been all over the place. We've interviewed Jamie probably 3 times over the course of the, of the program.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: I feel like he's always been skeptical of the open platform idea because you want your brand, like your, you know, their Verse brand, you want it to have some kind of premium, some prestige to it. And the second you let anyone now jump on the platform, And muck it up with random sketches, then you're gonna get into this problem that I think FX has struggled with, which was like, how do we allow anyone to publish here, but also elevate and highlight and curate the projects we think are actually gonna make us money? And I know OBJKT's gone through that issue too, of like people who have been salty and been like, I've never been on the front page of OBJKT and I've been publishing there for 3 years. And like the whole politics of who gets front page, like notoriety on OBJKT.
Speaker B: Mm-hmm.
Speaker A: I have no idea what their plan is for that. I'm super curious to see how it all plays out.
Speaker B: I just want to like also shout out OBJKT because in the midst of a potential fxhash shutdown, having that extra layer of security in terms of the preservation is right, so reassuring. And they've done an excellent job. I mean, the functionality of the platform, I like using it more than OpenSea, you know, and they do a combination of things, you know, they've done some drops with Casey Reas, you know, where it's like, Kind of long-form generative art dropped on OBJKT, right? And I think the more options we have and the more stable platforms we have, the better. So just wanted to throw that out there, that OBJKT has been really reassuring throughout this turmoil, for sure.
Speaker A: And Bootloader is like a side project from them too. And they finally added p5 and like JavaScript support there as well, because it was originally just like SVG and like native HTML stuff. So it's cool that they're there, but it, you know, they're still Tezos only. One of the reasons that fxhash left, they felt like the artists that left them left in part because they felt collector demand to put their art on ETH, or they had maybe been blessed with an Art Blocks curation and now they had this whole like ETH collector base. We've kind of seen like you can't drag them back to Tezos, not in great enough numbers at least. So like, I think fxhash thought, okay, like, well, we need to have this other chain supported and I don't imagine that Bootloader or OBJKT is ever going to cross over.
Speaker B: Yeah, that'd be wild. I don't fault fxhash for wanting to move towards ETH and Base. I mean, that's how they got that Coinbase venture funding, right? So, you know, it's unfortunate that there wasn't that kind of breakthrough moment where a big project generated a lot of hype and whatnot. But it is also kind of funny as someone who loves Tezos and loves Tezos art to see that Pretty much all the volume is Tezos legacy grails, right? Yeah, partially thanks to people like me.
Speaker A: I'm so tempted to talk to you about Pokémon because of my history with it. But I guess I would also like to ask, since you've been in the crypto space for so long, and like how weak this last cycle felt, not just the issue that it never shifted to NFTs really, which sucked for all of my art. But you know, like I held Bitcoin and ETH and stuff since 2020. And missed that opportunity, that window in 2021 to sell. And then I just held, right. And I, you know, I finally got out close enough-ish to the top in this cycle. But again, it was like still nowhere near the top that anyone who likes to do the charts and the cycle theory stuff would have said we were going to get to. You've been here, I think, one cycle longer than me, or maybe even like one and a half. So like, what do you feel about the space in general? How PvP it's become, how we just seem to be getting these shallower and shallower cycles? Like, do you hold out hope for that?
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: the tech or hold out hope for it as a speculative asset at all?
Speaker B: Like, longer term? I mean, I'm always a long-term Bitcoin bull. Basically, all I hold right now is Bitcoin and NFTs. I've completely liquidated all my meme tokens, whatever you want to call these tokens. Um, I don't hold any ETH, I don't hold any Tezos long term. I think that Bitcoin is, is the digital gold, and that thesis is still great. Um, I think, you know, it actually makes sense to see shorter, less explosive market cycles, you know, as that market matures. And it's just completely different now. I mean, we have ETFs and so many ways to invest in Bitcoin, and naturally it's just going to get less volatile as it matures. And, you know, we did see some crazy subcycles, like the Solana meme token trading was pretty insane.
Speaker A: Yeah.
Speaker B: I mean, that rivals anything I've ever been a part of in crypto, the stuff that was going on there. It was pretty short-lived, of course. For another NFT cycle to happen, it requires a convergence of just a lot of different factors that are timed correctly within the crypto market cycle and the global politics and all this stuff. I can't say what's going to happen, and it is disappointing to not see, you know, like a real NFT bull run, but I still feel if you're buying quality art that has historical value you'll do fine in the long run.
Speaker A: How much more buying do you think you personally would— will do? Erik Swahn aside, right? But like, are there other things that you're still targeting that you're like just kind of waiting and watching or putting in offers? I think we've moved down probably 90% twice on a lot of these projects. So there's always the potential to go down again. And what's $30 today could be $15 in a year. Like, are you Your Farbteiler is pretty complete because you've got all your monos. You've got so many awesome ones. I was actually looking at your stuff because I was like, I minted a mono. The one Farbteiler I minted was a mono and I was disappointed and I flipped it because I was like, I don't want— like, this is such a cool project. I love the colors. I got this weird mono piece and I was like, oh, I wonder if you incidentally had mine, but it wasn't. I think I had a green one. There's probably some more stuff on Verse you could be looking to get from him or other artists. Like, is there a point where you're just going to go like, Yeah. I feel like I've got enough of the old stuff, or if it goes down 90% again, you're going to be back in the Farbteiler zone, you know? Like, what's—
Speaker B: Well, if it goes down 90% again, I'll be buying more Garden Monoliths. That's right.
Speaker A: Right.
Speaker B: But yeah, so I still have a few goals with the Farbs. Obviously I'm extremely happy, but I do have a couple more specific goals. So I have the primary and secondary color wheel for mono outputs. I'm just a few away from getting all 12 colors, including tertiary.
Speaker A: Oh, okay. I didn't know you were gonna say that.
Speaker B: So that's one goal. It's going to require some outreach to, you know, these wallets are hard to track down and there's really only a couple mono outputs for each color. So it's going to require some help from some people, but it might happen. So I think that would be really incredible because it's, I mean, just the fact that the algorithm produced a few mono outputs from all 12 colors is pretty incredible, right? Like it worked out so perfectly and To even be able to collect all of those is pretty insane. So that's one goal. I think I'm still interested in more Dragons and Garden Monoliths, to be honest. I just think that, you know, they're the top dogs, and I've only grown closer to the collections as I have been doing this grail hunting, and it's kind of becoming what I'm really laser-focused on. And then to kind of reiterate that I've been selling Pokémon cards, I have kind of been trimming down my collection to what— okay, obviously I love these cards, but do I love them more than a Garden Monolith? And usually the answer is no, right? So I will be selling some more Pokémon cards regardless of whether that market is topped or not. I enjoy setting off the sales bot in the Discord, and I think it'll happen a few more times. I can't say, um, well, I almost don't want to say too much because there are some specific pieces that I have my eye on.
Speaker A: Yeah, no, don't, don't get like—
Speaker B: And, uh, what do you think of that? That anonymous wallet that's been scooping up dragons and gardens for like high prices.
Speaker A: Yeah, I've noticed it obviously, because I think it was just like a 15K Tez sale of a dragon that wasn't even—
Speaker B: I mean, it was a nice dragon, but it wasn't really nice, to be fair.
Speaker A: Yeah, but it wasn't a like paper one or a gold one or, or any of the other really, really rare scarce ones. Because I think you got your gold one for like 4K or 5K Tez, right?
Speaker B: So, uh, 6K Tez, the As I call it, the ancient dragon I got for, I think, 5.5. It's interesting. So I actually looked into their wallet. They've just been holding like 40,000 Tez for a year or two, did nothing with it, and then suddenly started buying.
Speaker A: So did they have any stuff though? Like it was just a dormant Tez-only wallet or they had art?
Speaker B: They sent Tezos from Bybit and they were getting staking rewards and did absolutely nothing else.
Speaker A: Until recently, maybe it was someone who like lost their keys or something for an extended period of time. I don't know.
Speaker B: I mean, I like the pieces they've selected. It almost seems like they're making a statement, like these prices are all a joke. Mm-hmm.
Speaker A: Yeah, I'm looking at what else they have here. So they've got well, so their their FX hash wallet is only two dragons and two garden monoliths.
Speaker B: They did buy a um a rare tezard.
Speaker A: Okay, interesting. This is definitely a wallet to keep track of and see if they keep buying. I do want to ask you about some Pokémon stuff. So aside from collecting Pokémon when I was young and being a fan of the franchise, I'm much closer to like Magic: The Gathering on the TCG side. And Magic is a game that's been around for a long time, since 1991, 1992, has a huge history. I think even you probably— I don't know if you play Magic, but I'm sure you know what a Black Lotus is just being a CCG collector, right?
Speaker B: I've heard of it, yeah.
Speaker A: You just know it. So it has these iconic cards that have Escaped their core collector base. And the thing that drives the value in Magic almost exclusively, besides, yeah, being rare and old because, uh, just back then they didn't make as many cards, is playability. And like, is the card actually good? And is it used in decks that are—
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: That can win? And not so much like— well, I should say almost not. There's some exceptions now, but like historically not just, oh, this is a foil version of that, right? Like, so my impression of looking at all this Pokémon content, which I get so much of on TikTok now, is that a lot of it's Pokémon is driven by aesthetic more than anything, and the various tiers of rarity and foiling and alternate art stuff that they do. So first of all, like, what's your background in Pokémon? I assume you played way back in the day.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: I'm guessing we might be similarly aged. And then like, how does it— how do you pick, like, how do you kind of go into a collection Do you trust your eye to be like, that's a cool card and I know that people are going to want it? Like, what's, what's the driving thing behind that?
Speaker B: Yes to that.
Speaker A: Um, yes. Okay.
Speaker B: I think it's entirely aesthetics for me. Like, the Pokémon cards that I bought in 2024 were almost exclusively vintage Japanese cards. One, because they're so much cheaper than the American first editions, like 100 times cheaper, and the holographic quality is actually better. They're not as scarce and they're easier to grade, so naturally they're not as valuable. But that was kind of my thesis, was like, I love these, I think they look better than the American versions, and I'm just gonna hoard these. And it actually played out quite well. I think the vintage Japanese cards went up about 5 to 10x over a course of weeks earlier in the year. So yeah, for me it's all about aesthetics and rarity. You know, I'm aware of rarity, right? Like, I keep track of, you know, what the pop report is. So I also collect PSA 10 graded cards, so you have that population report, which is really helpful information. when you're collecting, right? So yeah, for me it's all aesthetics, uh, has nothing to do with the playability. You know, I dabbled with that as a kid, going to Toys R Us and battling kids and trading and whatnot.
Speaker A: Does playability even matter so much in like the high-end collectible collector hobby? Because I like so many of these cards, it seems like people are either sitting on sealed product or they're cracking packs and grading them. It almost feels like a nightmare scenario if there's like a very desirable card that actually is competitively good because more of them will end up in slabs than in decks, right? Like, does the Pokémon— like, do the designers, do they have some awareness of this and they like make sure the playable cards aren't chase, like, so that way people can actually play?
Speaker B: It's a good question. For the modern stuff, I don't know. The modern cards also have crazy designs and very busy artwork, uh, really busy artwork and textures. They're cool. But as far as the value goes, I don't think that playability is so much associated with value from what I can tell.
Speaker A: Gotcha. You mentioned the Pop Report thing, like that to me is such a fascinating collector metric to latch on to. And I've seen that you mentioned, you mentioned this too, but I've seen in the videos people say like, oh yeah, the Japanese 10s, there's just too many of them. The population is too high because the cards are better made and the condition is better. And so like ironically, they're worth less, like compared to like the trash, you know, US cards, it's so much harder to get a 10 because they're they're misaligned, or they, you know, they've got some already— they've got some wear on the edges when you open them. It's so interesting that there are these like core platforms that own and like control this information, and often they're also the ones doing the grading, right? And I see so much like great grading paranoia and conspiracy too. Did you buy those Japanese cards raw and grade them, or did you buy them already graded when you—
Speaker B: I always buy them graded on eBay. Okay. Yeah, eBay is really The only resource I use for buying and selling. Yeah.
Speaker A: Do you buy into any of the skepticism or conspiracy around the various grading companies? And like, I'm sure you've seen those videos where someone's like, they crack it and they resubmit it and it gets like 2 grades higher. What is your impression of that stuff?
Speaker B: There's been some pretty crazy situations there. I don't look too much into it. Um, there's a bias towards new certifications, which is those that were more recently graded. They tend to be more stringent than those that were graded years ago. So there's a strong bias there, but I don't look too much into it, honestly. If it's a 10, it's a 10, and it's actually fairly liquid, like the Pokémon market. You can move these things in a matter of days if you want to. So I think that the PSA 10 is respected despite obviously a lot of inconsistencies that people point out. That's just gonna happen, right?
Speaker A: Mm-hmm.
Speaker B: I mean, it's impossible to do it. I mean, there are some egregious examples for sure. I don't look too much into that. Yeah.
Speaker A: Gotcha. You've just like, you got in last year, you've already 10x'd, and you're like, I don't even need to follow the controversy. Like, I'm just selling and buying art.
Speaker B: Like, yeah.
Speaker A: So do you see yourself continuing with the hobby much, or you're gonna keep the ones you like and then that's it?
Speaker B: So I have a binder full of graded PSA 10 cards, and I've been kind of trimming it down as the price goes up and trying to decide what it— like, what is the core collection that I actually care about? So I'm getting closer and closer to that. So At a certain point, I will have to decide, like, do I keep selling these or do I stop? And I think we're reaching that point. But I mean, we'll see if we get another, you know, the 30th anniversary set is coming out soon and that might generate more buzz and we might get another vintage pump too. So who knows? If things go really crazy, I will sell almost everything for sure.
Speaker A: Did you play as a kid? Was this— so there was some nostalgia for you or did you get in for like—
Speaker B: I mostly collected. I wasn't much of a player as far as, you know, the decks and whatnot. Mostly just collected for fun. Yeah.
Speaker A: But when you decided to jump in in 2024, was it just like purely this arbitrage thing that you noticed between Japanese and American? You're like, this, this is just too wide of a gap. And like, it just feels like there's too much potential. That was it.
Speaker B: Yeah. I mean, there was, there was a lot of buzz around Pokémon in general, right? It all came full circle. Right. And I did start, you know, buying the modern cards and whatnot and it just felt kind of corny. And I was like looking at the prices of these cards that I, that were just legendary as a kid. Right. And they were so cheap. And so it wasn't so much like, oh, I'm calculating that this will be a 10x, you know, whatever. It was just, wow, these are cheap and I want to buy them. It was kind of just like that. And yeah, it played out really well.
Speaker A: What you said right there is like one of the things that informed a lot of my more recent collecting of vinyl records. So I got back into collecting vinyl and actually collecting in a real way about 2, 2 and a half years ago. And I would go on Discogs, which is like the main site for trading vinyl records. And also it's like the database of everything. And I would say, oh, here's a record I want to get. And you'd see the original pressing and all the subsequent represses. And on some of these records, like the difference in price between an original pressing from the '70s and a 2025 repressing is only like $20.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: And that to me intuitively, again, being like a lifelong collector of various things, like that doesn't Makes sense, you know? And in some cases, okay, like, yes, there were, there were points in the history where they were printing so many records because it was like the most, you know, it was the only media format that people could get music on really. But that's when I was like, okay, I'm going to start collecting only first presses because I expect that moving forward, like if I want my collection to hold any value moving forward, I can't just be buying represses at Walmart and Target. And like, you know, even if the music sounds mostly the same or comparable.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: And so like, that's exactly it. I was like, this, this doesn't make sense. There seems to be a disconnect in the hobby. And of course then it became a way for me to like spend a lot more, more money in some cases. Yeah, but that's always how it is.
Speaker B: But you know, when you find that lane where you find something that's undervalued and it's something that you appreciate and enjoy looking at, or, you know, in your case, I don't know if you play those records, but collecting them and whatever the aesthetic value is to you, like, that's really to me what a good collecting opportunity is, right? It's apparent when you're in that situation that you want to do that.
Speaker A: Yeah, I do play them. There's some that I probably shouldn't. The whole slabbing thing hasn't come over to records in a big way yet. I think because it is such a— still a lot— I don't do this yet, but like a big part of the hobby for people is also their system and like fidelity and sound quality, and I just don't have the space or the money to do that. So for a lot of those folks, Owning an original this or that and then putting it under plastic, it's like, well, then you can't play the record and then you actually can't demonstrate it's a nice copy, right? How else are you going to demonstrate that this is like a great—
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: It's in mint condition. Like, but I have seen like Steve Aoki, for example, like he's slabbing his music media that he collects and stuff. So there are people out there who are like on the edge of it and starting to do that. I'd be very curious to see like what the hobby looks like in 5 or 10 years. Like there's one label or one distributor now who is, in addition to putting out, you know, their records into, into retail, if you go to their website, they'll have pre-graded copies for you to buy. That's like, these are 10s and they'll have like 50 10s of like the new Taylor Swift album up slabbed.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: Because getting a 10 in the wild is actually probably difficult. I've never, I don't know. But anyway, it's just like, it's, it's funny to see, 'cause I feel like it's the Pokémon-ification of other hobbies, right? Like they're seeing this out there and they know there's a premium and it's, uh, it could come over. It'll be an interesting day, I guess, when that happens.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: Uh, I wanna jump back to Verse real quick. So I noticed, you know, we, we talked a little bit about their curated stuff and perhaps they're, they're changing the platform and you've collected some of their most recent release, the Brain Rot stuff.
Speaker B: Yeah.
Speaker A: And it's kind of been interesting seeing them between, between that and the Tabor PFP now. succeeding in this PFP space by kind of hybridizing it with art. I think the Tabor one, I mean, I minted them because they were free to me, you know, like the 5 or so that I got because of the way they dripped those out. I did not mint any of the Brainrot ones. But it's weird, right? Like, it's clearly attracted a lot of new people to their platform who are more than happy to come in and complain in the Discord.
Speaker B: Oh, the Discord was a mess.
Speaker A: Yeah, lots of just, just a lot of green leaf users complaining. But is this the game now in a way? Like, is this going to be the, you have to have the candy to support the platform and then you're going to have—
Speaker B: I don't know. I was just so, so like for both of those projects, I was just so excited to see like a 10K PFP project mint out. You know, like, that's such a foreign concept. Like, that's so many editions, right? I haven't witnessed that in so long. I also love long-form AI. That's a whole separate topic I could talk about for 30 minutes. But, um, it was just kind of a fun thing to mint. It's cool to see it kind of succeed and, you know, get the floor price going up and whatnot. Human Resources project in particular has some very devoted collectors who are really doing the role-playing thing. And it's just kind of a fun thing. Like when I see those opportunities, I'm still a crypto degen at the end of the day. I'm going to spam the mint button, right? Like regardless of What I think of the art specifically, but yeah, it's just really cool to see.
Speaker A: Did you ever collect on Emprops?
Speaker B: Yes. And actually, so I said I could talk about this for 30 minutes. I actually dropped a few projects of my own on Emprops.
Speaker A: Oh, did you?
Speaker B: That's how into it I got.
Speaker A: Cool.
Speaker B: It's not something I expect people to notice, but I understand as someone who's done that with AI where you're just prompting and inputting images and then you see the result after people mint it and you're like, oh, that wasn't quite random. It should have been more random, right? Those weren't quite the outputs I want. So it gives me more respect for generative artists and other types of artists too, because like it is hard to get the set of outputs that's as diverse as you want and within your parameters. So yeah, Emprops, I don't know if they're still up and running, but, uh, they're still on.
Speaker A: Yeah, it was a very interesting platform. I collected a little bit off of there and I tried also to like figure out how to mint and use their tools to create something. 'Cause like every time I get, I see this new stuff, I always Try to figure it out and see if I can release something. I was never able to get their whole syntax and like the whole thing working in a way that made sense to me. And then I had a, you know, I have a baby, so it's like, you know, I gave up on it. But I thought it was really cool. And we of course talked to those guys like when it came out.
Speaker B: And I think that platform was revolutionary. I mean, it's, it may have just been a little early in the bear market, but long-form AI is such a cool topic.
Speaker A: Those brain rots really were not interesting to me aesthetically or thematically, but then I know some artists who are, who have also like dabbled in it and they were like, it's just so well done, was their feedback. Like, yeah, you to do 10,000 of those and they all look—
Speaker B: 10,000 is a lot.
Speaker A: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So it clearly, you know, there must be, there's, there's a lot of craft to that, even if it's, um, you know, I think they're just kind of goofy.
Speaker B: But yeah. Um, I can't say they resonate with me super well, but, um, still really fun.
Speaker A: Yeah, I think the human resources one is pretty interesting. I was skeptical of it until I listened to the Tabor first talks and him kind of like talking about it more. I've just been holding the ones that I've got and we'll see, because I know he's also like, he's an artist that they're betting big on, I think, like long term with the platform.
Speaker B: So hey, it's my PFP on Twitter.
Speaker A: So right.
Speaker B: Yeah, I found the one that I like and I'm supporting it.
Speaker A: Yeah. Is there anything else you want to touch on before we start wrapping up here? Is there anything you feel like we missed that you want to—
Speaker B: I mean, we kind of touched on everything. We touched on the Long-form AI, the Pokémon, you know, my obsessiveness with Zancan and Erik Swahn and those collections. Yeah.
Speaker A: Cool. I mean, yeah, I feel like we got through a lot. It's been great just like chopping it up with another collector and talking about the space. You know, I hope that we get some good news-ish from fxhash at some point here. That would be ideal.
Speaker B: Just to add on to that. So I don't know if, let's say fxhash were to shut down. if OBJKT would perpetuate those existing listings or not. But if they don't, I think that would actually be really interesting to just clear the order books and have like a fresh supply and demand. It's not necessarily a bad thing in the long run.
Speaker A: You'd have to think that a lot of the listings on fxhash might not have been touched for years, right?
Speaker B: Some of the ones that got bought recently actually were listed years ago.
Speaker A: Yeah. When Tezos might have been a much different, different price and stuff.
Speaker B: So it's interesting. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker A: Well, we're still here. We're still kind of watching and lurking and making these episodes from time to time. And, you know, thankful to folks like you who are still happy to come on and talk with us.
Speaker B: Oh, thanks for having me. I hope my rambling was somewhat entertaining.
Speaker A: Oh, it's great. And, you know, best of luck with your continued collecting and the Pokémon stuff. And if you ever get into records, you know, hit me up. I'll give you some ideas of where to start. Cool. Well, that was McLlama, everyone. And let me— I thought I had your Twitter up here. I'm going to plug it for you really quick.
Speaker B: My tag is Pompous LL.
Speaker A: Pompous LL. Wait, maybe we should close on this. Where'd the McLlama name come from?
Speaker B: Yeah, that's actually a great question. So back in 2017, everyone on crypto Twitter was basically some sort of animal. You had Wassis, which are some unidentified animal creature thing. But, um, I started out as the Pompous Llama. That's how I created the account. And it was kind of a real-life nickname that someone had passively given me, and I thought it was kind of funny. So that's how it started. And then, uh, it was too long to type in as a Twitter tag, and so it was just Pompous LL instead of Pompous Llama. Then the bear market happened and people started putting, uh, McDonald's hats on people's, uh, PFPs. And so then I turned into McLlama. Like, I had the, you know, the joke being that we're all gonna be— I remember that. Yeah. Um, so that's kind of how McLlama started, and that's just the name that And stuff and how people know me. So yeah.
Speaker A: There you go. Well, throw, throw him a follow @PompousLL and we'll put all that down below and we'll link to your Raster collection too so people can browse that and see all the Farbteilers and the other great stuff that you've collected there. I scrolled through, you've, you've got stuff from all eras of FXHash and you've got a bunch of AI and other digital art stuff too. Like I see a lot of this artist culture hacker here too. And like, I'm—
Speaker B: Yeah, I like glitch art as well.
Speaker A: Yeah. And some John, J-J-John stuff. So you've definitely, you've definitely been around for a minute collecting all this stuff. That's it for this one, I think, everyone. I hope you all enjoyed. Big thanks to McLlama for coming on, talking to us about art.
Speaker B: And thanks to everyone who's still active in FXHash. I see all of you in the Discord reacting to purchases. Everyone who's active is a legend right now.
Speaker A: That's nice. Legendary status achieved. Cool, man. Well, thanks again for coming on. Hope you all enjoyed. And yeah, we'll be back again soon-ish with another episode, I'm sure. All right. Later, everyone.
Speaker B: Thanks again for having me. Yeah.
Speaker A: Bye.
Speaker B: Bye. We're waiting, always. We're waiting to be signed.
Change log // 1 edit
2026-07-12Removed extraneous closing line — Will
—Initial transcript — auto-transcribed (AssemblyAI) and readability-edited.