Waiting To Be Signed · interviews on generative art, on-chain
← Index
Interview // APR 2024

Jamie Gourlay, Founder of Verse

Title: Evolving Verse
Role: Founder, Verse
Platform: Verse
Duration: 1h 1m
Hosts: Will & Trinity
Listen on Spotify Guest on X Download MP3
#061 · Evolving Verse
Self-hosted audio // press play
1h 1m
MP3 ↓

Spot an error? Highlight the words or lines you want to fix — an “edit” button appears, and the panel opens with your selection ready to edit.

Will: All right, hello, and welcome everyone to another episode of Waiting to Be Signed—a very special interview episode. We're joined today again by Jamie from Verse, back for round two. Trinity's here as well. Jamie, how's it going? We're happy to have you back.

Jamie Gourlay: Thank you so much for having me. It's going well. Excited to be here.

Will: We're excited too. We love these follow-up interviews because we don't have to spend the first ten minutes getting your background—we can go right into the questions. Let's start with the last year at Verse. What do you think you've learned as a platform across 2023? You've shipped a lot of new features, but philosophically, a lot has changed too, at least from what we've intuited watching the platform move. Walk us through some of the big lessons and takeaways.

Trinity: For some frame of reference—for Jamie, who may have forgotten everything that's happened in the last year because it's been such a whirlwind, and for listeners too: the last time we interviewed Jamie was right after Cosmic Rays came out. That was one of the first big collector-curated drops that really put Verse on the map, with that viral moment where everyone was sharing everything all the time. Collector curation was such an innovative spot in the space, and you've done a lot more since then. So—rest of 2023, moving into this year, go.

Jamie Gourlay: What we've learned—I truly don't know where to start. I could speak for hours, if not days. Any particular area you want me to start with? There are so many different parts of the space, the business, everything.

Will: Maybe the most obvious one, a very market-oriented one, would be philosophy around releases. Halfway through the year we started seeing the solos come out, a change in cadence, locking in more on these refunding auctions. As the market went down—or rather, stayed down, since when we last spoke it was just the very beginning of the bear market—how did that inform your pivot? What was it like internally, and what's your outlook now on those lessons learned?

Jamie Gourlay: You mentioned Cosmic Rays, Trinity—that was part of a group exhibition we did about a year ago. I think one of the biggest takeaways from the bear market was the realization that collectors want to gravitate to a smaller number of seemingly safer things, which makes a ton of sense for a lot of reasons. It's been tricky, because on one hand it doesn't feel great to focus on, let's be honest, a really small number of artists. But it's also just reality that there aren't many artists who are going to feel relevant and part of the conversation for a very long time. We accepted that if we're going to offer collectors something that isn't incredibly risky to put their money into, we need to focus on a small number of artists and do all we can to work closely with them, so they can make a splash and hopefully stay relevant long after the release.

So we've started working much more closely with artists than we were a year ago—that's been a significant shift in thinking. I can't see us doing group shows again the way we did a year ago. Adam and Tender are doing an ongoing group show right now that I think works because it's structured very differently: one release per week, as opposed to one a day, which I can hardly believe we were doing a year ago.

I'm sure other lessons will come out over the course of this conversation, but honestly, I feel like I knew nothing at all about this space back then, and I still feel like there's so much to learn. We've gone from knowing nothing to knowing a bit in these different areas.

Trinity: The takes Will and I had a year ago were shaped by a completely different market, so I don't think you should be too hard on yourself. I'm thinking about some of the other group shows you did, releasing like twelve projects in one day—the architecture show, for instance. Hugely massive, hugely exciting.

Jamie Gourlay: Yes.

Trinity: But also hugely confusing from a collector's point of view.

Jamie Gourlay: And probably not in the best interests of the artists, to be honest. We learned a ton about sales strategy from that one—there are fifty lessons on what not to do with the Generative Architecture Show, and that's absolutely all on me. Basic things that seem obvious now: if you're doing a ranked auction, you need fewer pieces than likely bidders willing to bid a reasonable amount. If there are more artworks than bidders, everyone who wants one gets one, and then it becomes a frantic scramble for bargains, pushing the price up to the point where it's no longer a total steal, but still cheap. I could talk all day about mechanics and sales strategy.

Will: One thing we really picked up on throughout 2023, which you've already touched on, was this consolidation toward a smaller number of artists by platforms, and a parallel consolidation of collectors toward highly curated, premium-feeling releases—what Verse was doing through Solos, what Art Blocks was doing through Curated, what Tonic was doing with prints and physical offerings. That wasn't something we predicted when we were thinking broadly about the space; it became obvious only once it was happening. How did that shift your approach to courting artists? Has it actually gotten easier, since there are only a few platforms left that can command that level of premium? Or has it gotten more challenging, since more platforms are competing for the same artists?

Jamie Gourlay: We were skeptical of the fully open approach from day one, because if an artist has a choice between someone endorsing them and shining a bright light on their work, or going it alone, I'd guess most artists choose the promotion and endorsement route. Looking at what was happening in web3 and NFTs and comparing it to the art world—it was amazing watching what happened on fx(hash), incredibly exciting—but it didn't feel like anything had fundamentally changed to make it suddenly make more sense for an artist to be their own promoter. Instagram has always existed; it's always been possible for artists to represent themselves and reach an audience. But it's still always made more sense to work with someone who can endorse and promote you. I don't see how that's changed in this new world.

So from the beginning, we anticipated that artists would want to work with people who could promote and endorse them. That said, NFTs have this amazing phenomenon where collectors rally around artists and do a lot of the gallery's work themselves, which is really hard for an artist to make happen on their own. So I still see a role for promoters and galleries. I've spoken with quite a few artists who say the promotional side is painful and exhausting—not the part they enjoy—and they're happy to outsource it. Of course, some artists are brilliant at it, but that's true in the old world too. Hirst is a marketing genius; that's kind of his shtick. There are great artists who are also great promoters in web3. I'd love to hear your thoughts—has anything really changed about the open-versus-closed question from a year ago to now?

Trinity: One big theme has been how this shifts depending on the market you're in. In an expanding market, like throughout 2021 and part of 2022, you get an influx of collectors and an influx of new artists who need proving grounds. A lot of the people who've had big success on Verse came from the open-platform world. But the continued success of open platforms is contingent on there being more collectors in the community. In an interview we just did with Erik Calderon from Art Blocks, the point came up that artists now outnumber collectors. Do you sense that within the Verse community? Obviously artists are also collectors, but there needs to be a wider differential between creators and everyone else. Does that resonate?

Jamie Gourlay: Definitely. One thing I've been relieved to see is that there is a real art market here. In the early days, it really wasn't obvious that people would want to collect digital artworks and NFTs at all. It's cool that even in the absence of hype or any assurance that something might go up even a tiny bit, people are still collecting. That's been a pretty interesting learning.

Will: We can go a couple directions here—growth, bringing people back, whether you think they will come back. Also, thinking back to our original interview: one of the things you talked about as part of the initial idea behind Verse was being a conduit between the traditional art world and web3, onboarding artists and collectors and growing the space that way—not just the crypto-native degens, of whom there's a very small subset who've authentically grown to love collecting art. Let's go there first. It's been a year—has your doctor friend collected any more NFTs on Verse?

Jamie Gourlay: Every day he's sending me Barbarians. So, definitely still going.

Barbarians — Jacek Markusiewicz

Will: What's it been like otherwise? From our side, there are a few names we don't recognize, but I don't know if that's because they came from the AI art world or elsewhere. If big names from the traditional art world have come over, it hasn't really hit our radar. Can you speak to that year of trying to build and onboard from both sides—collectors and artists?

Jamie Gourlay: I've changed my thinking here a little. I think I mentioned before how great it could be if someone like David Hockney did a release with Gagosian — say, the newest Hockney iPad paintings as NFTs. That would be epic. Every art world collector would be in for one, and it's very possible that something like that could very quickly legitimize digital art NFTs in the eyes of the wider world. It would make it to every art publication and probably beyond.

But I'm now less convinced than I was a year ago that it would actually be as helpful for us as I thought. I'm sure it would help, just maybe not as much. That's mainly from realizing how important community is, and how the art world community works in its own particular way too. If a well-known artist in this space does a release, everyone gets excited — it's easy to part with money for an artist you rate and respect, whose work your friends collect too. It's the same in the traditional art world: people don't spend six or seven figures on artists they've never heard of. You're a collector walking through Frieze, all your friends know Richard Prince, you know the dealer, you know the auction market, you've seen comparable pieces sell for certain amounts — there's so much context there that just doesn't exist in the NFT space yet. That context makes it easy to collect work by artists you know, but it also makes owning that work more fun. I've bought a lot of Erik Swahn pieces, for instance, and I know lots of other Erik Swahn collectors — that context around the artist really does make it more enjoyable. Without being part of this community, I find it hard to see how there's going to be much crossover between this world and the traditional art world.

That said, we're still giving it a go. We've been working since we started on landing a release by an art world artist, and next week we have our first really big one: Tabor Robak. Tabor's in the Met, the MoMA, the Serpentine, the Whitney — you name it. Really well-known, brilliant artist. He's actually already done a release on Art Blocks, back in 2021, and it's fantastic — so he's receptive to what's happening here, even if he's more native to the traditional art world.

The piece is called Broken Printer. Tabor worked in a print shop at 13, and he loved the way printers would break — things coming out raw and misaligned. He was also really into clip art at the time, playing around with early Photoshop, and this whole series harks back to that nostalgia. When you generate the works, it really takes you back — I'm in my mid-30s, and it reminds me of being eight, nine, ten years old, playing on my family's computer, trying to print things out. It's a series of 4,000: he wants each piece to feel slightly disposable, which is notable given his work usually sells for a lot of money to very wealthy people. These will be much more affordable — a series of 4,000 on Solana, playing right into this new world. He's really embracing the NFT community, and we're excited to work with an artist willing to take a bit of a risk. We joked the other day that the antithesis of the Met is probably Solana — and Tabor's doing it. We're definitely going to get some art world people looking in, and hopefully they'll see how fun it is and maybe give it another go. Maybe some of Tabor's artist friends will check it out too.

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

And hopefully, if it goes well, we'll get an article here or there in the art press that does us some favors. Really excited for it, but it still very much remains to be seen how the art world and the NFT space work together.

Will: What's been the actual breakthrough with artists, then — beyond just giving them time to come up with something authentic? What's the value proposition for someone who's potentially selling an NFT that none of their traditional collectors will touch, because they don't care about crypto or don't want to go through the steps to collect, even though it's not that hard? Prices on the primary market have just continued to come down. So is this really just an exposure play — you're going to sell this for less than you normally would, but you might get a hundred new collectors, some of whom are rich and might want a gallery piece from you someday? What's been the unlock?

Jamie Gourlay: Honestly, a bad market has really helped, because the issue before was stigma — artists didn't want to be seen as cash grabbers, didn't want to damage a hard-built reputation just to do an NFT and make money. It wasn't worth it.

Trinity: The irony — "I'm going to be less successful."

Jamie Gourlay: Right. But releasing when everyone knows NFTs aren't cool right now is kind of cooler. We've been finding it way easier to have these conversations — people are way more open-minded today than a year ago. Layla's been going around having conversation after conversation, and there are some cool things in the works. Petra Courtwright is on our site right now, and that's teeing up a hopeful project to follow. So the bad market has been great for this — we expect a lot more art world artists to start exploring it. That said, the reality is most of the artists native to this space are just stronger.

Trinity: I don't want to put words in your mouth, but the artist community here is much more tied into the overall community through channels like Twitter and Discord, and much more real about it — Roxanne is always in the fx(hash) Discord just talking shit and making bad jokes. It's a more genuine experience. There's a sense of familiarity and comfort that the traditional art world doesn't really encourage — it favors more separation.

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

Jamie Gourlay: It's also just the nature of these artists' work. Andreas, Kim, Lenny — they were doing this before NFTs came around; that's just what they do. They haven't had to change anything, they've just kept producing as they always have. Whereas a lot of art world artists we've spoken to are trying to create something for this space, and you can tell. We're not chasing the art world for its own sake, and I don't think those artists are necessarily stronger. But I do suspect getting a stamp of approval from that world will help us on quite a few levels.

Trinity: On that transition between the two worlds — one thing that stood out from an events perspective this year was you at Art Basel Miami, rubbing shoulders with traditional art world people, showing great work by the likes of Zach Lieberman. What was that experience like, and how did the work being presented there, including the collaboration with Tender, stand up against what you were exhibiting next to? What conversations were you having?

Jamie Gourlay: That was completely Tender — that really wasn't our doing at all. All credit to Adam and Tender for that.

Will: But you sold it.

Jamie Gourlay: We were honored to host it — thank you, Adam. But Adam was the one having the conversations. I know he sold a lot of works to quote-unquote "trad" buyers, but they're not part of the Discord, not part of the conversation. I doubt many of them have become NFT collectors because of that.

Trinity: Presumably they create a Verse account so they can continue collecting through it, even if they're not using the web3 component at all.

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

Jamie Gourlay: That's one of the statistics worth tracking over time — what percentage of people are connecting wallets versus staying entirely off-chain. Over the past few weeks I've started feeling more and more that it's not a problem if we don't onboard people from outside crypto for a while, because the people already here are going to collect so much more, they get it, and they're part of the community without us having to beg them to join. It's only going to grow — every wave, more people come in, and it becomes normalized over time. Eventually people will realize this is cool, this is art collecting, and they'll tell their friends. So I'm starting to feel like we don't need to worry so much about onboarding people from outside the space.

Trinity: That seems reflected in the announcement you put out yesterday, being more open about your web3 status through the inclusion of a connect-wallet button, which up to now only existed once you'd created an account. Is that a philosophy shift you're committing to going forward?

Jamie Gourlay: It was actually there before, just behind a login button — I don't know why. We'd been planning for a while to make it more obvious, since it turned out a lot of people missed that they had to click login in order to connect. But yes, I think the answer is a shift. The reality is there's an admittedly small but healthy market of buyers here already, and no matter how much we do to onboard non-crypto people, it's going to pale in comparison to a bull run. We might be able to move the needle by 0.1%, but a big boom, lots of press — there's going to be another Beeple. Maybe not Beeple himself, but someone, some headline, and people will start looking at digital art again. Hopefully this time we can present ourselves as a serious, credible space rather than something that feels so Bored-Ape-y.

I've come to feel it's okay to just serve the people who are already here, and let the market and whatever excitement eventually comes do its own thing. That's not to say we're not still trying to figure out how to bring new people in — we've talked about gift vouchers, for instance. I'd love to give my friends something for birthdays or Christmas that they can spend easily without setting up a wallet. So we'll keep trying new things, but we're definitely stressing less about chasing non-crypto people for now.

Will: You've got basically every other platform out there trying to figure out how to bring the next million people in, so I guess you can just hope one of them scratches the lottery ticket. That's a big theme you'll hear in the Snowfro interview -- the pivot they're making with Sansa is surprisingly opposed to what you're saying. They're trying to create a new open platform at a time when we were already skeptical of open platforms, and now we're even more skeptical. It's an interesting move by them, by fx(hash), by platforms like Highlight too -- all just trying to get tools out to as many people as possible, cheap, cheap, cheap, using L2s.

So to turn that into a question: can you expand on your skepticism of open platforms? Obviously they've had their utility, and a lot of that utility has redounded to Verse, because they created that first cohort of artists who had the price points and community-awarded hype to justify doing something like a Verse solo, or an Art Blocks Curated. But those platforms are really fallow now, and as far as we can tell, there hasn't been a new crop of artists, at least in generative art -- maybe they're in A.I. right now.

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

Jamie Gourlay: Hmm.

Will: I know you guys have dabbled in that a bit too. But if those platforms just cease, what would the process be for someone new to come to Verse and say, "Trust me, you can sell this for $1,500"? Where would Verse get that confidence to give someone a solo if we don't have a thriving open marketplace for them to actually demonstrate they can achieve that?

Jamie Gourlay: On the first thing you mentioned, about onboarding new people -- I feel like the market is going to do the work for us. I don't just mean the market going up; I mean every time it goes up and down and up and down, it's news, and more people come in. We only need a few people who start off trading meme coins, then trading something else, then something else, and eventually find art. I think that's probably sustainable.

On open platforms -- it's usually reasonably obvious from Twitter what has a chance of doing well. I don't think an artist necessarily has to start selling somewhere before they have a chance. If they're really good, and they have Twitter, and their work gets picked up on by anyone, then hopefully at some point... We do keep a close eye on what's happening on fx(hash) and the other open platforms, and obviously to an extent we need to make decisions on what we think might sell well. But as much as we can, we try to work with artists we think are just really great. Lonliboy has done an awesome job working with artists he genuinely rates. Financially, that program of his may not make too much sense, but I think it's really important in terms of putting strong work out there.

It's tricky because we're a really small team and can only do so much ourselves -- which is why we're moving toward supporting and co-promoting releases with galleries and curators. We're not trying to be a gallery ourselves. Our plan for the year ahead is to identify great curators who have knowledge and experience in areas we don't, because there are a lot of the same names bouncing around this space, and digital art is a pretty broad thing -- there's a lot happening outside it. By working with curators who really know what they're talking about, we're hoping to identify good things more easily.

But in terms of what artists should do -- fx(hash) does work, doesn't it? Great artists can release on fx(hash) and do well.

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

Will: It worked during the bull. You could do some napkin math on what they're making in fees a month and draw your own conclusions about the sustainability of that, along with others that opened and closed, or opened and moved slowly, on Ethereum. Even on L2s like Prohibition -- the one project Erik did there is like 95% of all the volume that platform has ever done. In 2023, with a few exceptions, someone selling out a project for 15 tez on fx(hash) is big news, and that means they probably made $100 or $200 off it. I don't know how the numbers add up unless the market comes back in a big way.

Trinity: There's also just not enough scale. You get those once or twice a month, maybe. And we talk about the space quite a bit.

Will: And you don't get the people who got started there coming back, because it feels too dead. William hasn't come back.

Trinity: Jeres hasn't come back.

Will: A lot of people have been gone for a year plus, even though they have their genesis projects and built their community there. That's a whole other problem neither of us can really speak to -- what could fx(hash) do to bring those people back? But the other half of it is there's just not new people.

Jamie Gourlay: You asked what the process is for someone new. But if you're an emerging artist who's never released work before, the fact that you can't do a release and make $40 grand doesn't strike me as a massive problem. I think it's okay to start with a small release that maybe won't get picked up on by too many people. If it's good, people talk about it, and eventually that artist starts to get more recognized. Is it really a problem that it's hard for artists to become an overnight success and make millions?

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

Will: I don't think it's necessarily a problem -- I'm speaking more to what happens for a curated platform if there's no next batch of artists. Are you just going to keep selling Mapan? What if he has another kid and quits art? It's such a small number of artists viable right now that if half of them left for the trad art world, you'd need people coming up to fill those places.

Trinity: How many new artists do you need to get to in a year?

Jamie Gourlay: Those artists around us share their work and have side jobs, and that's cool. The curator platforms keep a close eye on social media and do find them. Whether they're minting and selling on open platforms maybe doesn't even necessarily matter.

Trinity: If--

Jamie Gourlay: Sure, it's a shame they might miss out on some sales, but I don't think it means they don't have a chance. We're certainly not exclusively looking at artists who've already been successful -- we're scouring the internet trying to identify who might be the next William A. Fan. And I know other curators we're talking to and working with are doing the same. So I'm not totally sure that's a massive problem. Interesting move from Art Blocks, though. I'm looking forward to hearing your interview with Eric. I was absolutely hooked on fx(hash) a year ago and would love to see that energy come back. Hopefully a new market brings it back. What are your thoughts on it?

Will: Candidly, they need to figure out a way to give artists who started there a reason to come back. I don't know what that is -- maybe it's money, literally "here's ten grand plus you get to do your drop." Or maybe they just need to wait till the end of 2024, let all this meme coin stuff shift, and hope everything rotates back into art -- which would help all the platforms, not just fx(hash). It would help Verse and Art Blocks too.

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

Trinity: The other thing that would help fx(hash) is that so much of the fx(hash) community is centered around the Tezos community. I saw a tweet a couple days ago that Tezos is at risk of falling outside the top 100 coins by market cap, so I wonder how tightly tied the two are together. Verse is protected -- not just from Tezos, but from the whole chain conversation -- by obfuscating chain to a great extent, which I think is really smart, at least in the current market. I think fx(hash) is working to pivot, with the integration of Ethereum and Base -- both smart moves, especially with Base being so hugely picked up on Farcaster. But I agree with you, Will, that getting that next influx of collectors, and artists looking to get in on that, is going to be big. fx(hash) got started because of the strong artist community that was also prevalent in Tezos, and I feel like that Tezos art community has been successful and is moving to Ethereum.

Will: There are so many confounding factors too. A lot of people who weren't having much success on fx(hash) during the heyday -- because there were so many other artists getting attention, back when we'd get Zancan stuff frequently, and there was always the rumor that William was going to make another drop -- maybe they'd sell out at 10 tez, but they never broke through, never sold out 100 or 200, never had their projects really appreciate. A lot of those artists scattered. There was, for a brief moment, an open platform on Polygon at the end of 2022, beginning of 2023 -- they'd burn projects that didn't mint on fx(hash) and put them on Polygon. Then that platform closed, and they tried things on Solana, and now they're trying things on Bitcoin.

I feel like they've maybe made the mistake of leaving a community that could have eventually supported them, that was actually authentically interested in art, in pursuit of liquidity -- conflating sales with validation. Obviously some people need the money, so you can't really argue with that. But it's not really a way to build a collector base, at least in my opinion. It doesn't look good, from where I sit, to see someone moving around and not sticking anywhere.

It was funny -- Trinity, you already mentioned it -- Eric said we have too many artists, more artists than collectors. But at the same time, I feel like the entire problem the space faces is a supply-side problem: there's only so many artists people actually want to collect. We could easily add 10,000 more artists, because maybe only 100 of them will be "safe enough" to collect. We need more artists so that there's real optionality between fx(hash), Art Blocks, and Verse. Right now there's just enough of them to bounce between the curated sites that they don't need to go to the open platforms anymore. That, to me, is the big problem. We've seen maybe a handful of new artists actually trying, and a lot of low-effort stuff on fx(hash) and other open platforms. I don't know how you magic up 10,000 new artists, though -- maybe that comes with the bull run too, as people want to look into creative coding again and try their luck at making tokens.

Jamie Gourlay: I've spoken with at least a couple of collectors who've said there have only been three things they've wanted to mint in the past four months, which is kind of strange, and maybe leads to exactly that. I do feel a lot of artists are sitting it out at the moment, waiting to see what happens market-wise before releasing work. So maybe there are more artists out there with things in store who just haven't wanted to deploy yet.

Trinity: I see a lot of things posted on fx(hash) that in a prior market would've been hugely flipped, five times the price, huge hype cycle—but we're seeing them not mint out now. I think it really comes down to having a large enough group of collectors willing to drive that market activity, because that fuels conversation, fuels ardor, fuels people wanting to talk more, collect more, pay more attention. I noticed in the announcement Verse put out yesterday, you added an activity feed to the website, trending art on the website—making it more market-focused. Is that partially to capture interest beyond the people sitting in your Discord all day?

Broken Printer — Tabor Robak

Jamie Gourlay: What Fellowship and NiceAntes have done is incredible—it's on everyone's lips, it's not going anywhere, it's genuinely famous. It feels safe to own. You see influencers on Twitter saying, "this is one of my top works for the next cycle," and so on. Getting Verse releases seen in that light is our job, because for the artist it puts them on the map, and for collectors it means they have something that isn't going anywhere—something they'll still be proud of years from now because it's still relevant. So the more we can do to increase the odds of that happening with releases on Verse, the better. That trending page is part of trying to make that happen.

There's a lot wrapped up in this. The whole series-size question is a hard one. We've really struggled with it with art-world artists, because everyone wants to be holding Ringers, Anticyclone, and so on for the next cycle, and those are all well networked, for lack of a better term. So far, everything with that kind of longevity, or potential longevity, comes from a pretty large series size. I can't think of anything under 500 that's done what A Life in West America or Anticyclone or Chromie Squiggles have done. Garden, Monoliths is maybe the best example of something under 500, but even that doesn't have anywhere near the liquidity—and therefore conversation, and therefore relevance—of something like Anticyclone.

So the trending and activity page is us trying to help our releases stay on people's lips. That's part of a broader strategy that includes working with artists on series size and other factors that might help their chances. It's a hard conversation with art-world artists, because most want to release three unique pieces, and it's pretty hard for a collector to justify getting involved with something that's probably going to be forgotten pretty soon.

Will: You have to truly love it as a collector to buy a one-of-one from a collection of three one-of-ones. That's the classic art-world scenario: it goes into a family's house and doesn't come up for auction for 30, 40, 50 years. No one sees it, and it's only news when it resurfaces because it hasn't been available since the '70s. We don't have a long enough timeline in NFTs to even imagine that being viable.

Jamie Gourlay: It's even harder than that, honestly. The art-world collector who hangs something on their wall for 20 years—more often than not, their friends and family will still know what it is, still see it in the house. It benefits from network effects, just in a different way than an Anticyclone does. But buying something from an art-world artist who may never release again—people may never see this piece in your wallet at all. That's tough.

Anticyclone — William Mapan

Will: Shifting a little bit—there was a tweet thread you put out under your own account, not the Verse account, about Verse's function. You said Verse isn't a gallery, but that it does some gallery-like things—one being buying art on the secondary market. That plays into this too: keeping floors up, keeping pieces top of mind. If Verse buys a piece, it goes into that sales feed, and there's narrative built around it. Can you talk about that decision philosophically? It feels foreign on the NFT side, but maybe not so strange from the traditional art-world side. And of the collections you've bought from, how should we interpret that? When Verse buys from one set of artists, is that a signal that we should expect to see a lot more from them on Verse going forward? You obviously can't sweep every collection.

Jamie Gourlay: We're not a gallery, but we created the Solos arm, and I suppose we run Solos somewhat like a gallery. The issue is we don't have the bandwidth to run it properly, the way a real gallery would. The gallery model, by and large, is to work with a small number of artists and support them on an ongoing basis—and because you do that, it makes sense to take a healthy cut on primary sales. If you're a gallery working with six artists, you take their work to a fair, sell a few pieces, and a couple of years later, if one comes up on the secondary market, you don't want it hanging around—it's not great for the artist's market—so you buy it, take it off secondary, and maybe show it at a later fair. Great marketing for the artist.

That's a model we're not able to fully commit to right now because we don't have the bandwidth, but we'd like to work more closely with artists doing exactly that. If we could work with a small number of artists, buy pieces off secondary, take them to a fair, find new collectors, get great photographs, and expose the work to thousands of new people—I think that's in everyone's best interest, including the collectors we sell to, because the more relevant something is and stays, the better for everyone.

We don't have firm plans for the works we've collected so far. We've picked up quite a few Fields and Funktors. Hopefully one day, once we're in a stronger financial position, we can do a fair somewhere and show Eric's work to thousands of people. But no plans yet. The general thinking is that it's important work to do what we can to help things stay relevant—and, of course, we also want to stay solvent as a company.

Trinity: You want to keep producing and showcasing great work for years, decades, centuries. Part of that has meant big business changes—the biggest recent one being the shift to Solana. You mentioned a lot of new wallets connected for that release. Do you still feel good about integrating Solana? Is that a continued step forward for Verse, and does it open the door to other chains too?

Jamie Gourlay: I don't personally see the Solana move as a big shift in strategy, really. It was—

Anticyclone — William Mapan

Trinity: You're hedging.

Jamie Gourlay: Solana is up massively, there's a ton of energy in that ecosystem. Most collectors in this space got here through some kind of exciting boom, and a lot of people who start as traders end up as collectors. With so much activity on one chain, our thinking was: we could use more revenue, and maybe we can find new collectors there. We don't have Base yet, so Solana was our best bet. I wouldn't call it a big part of our strategy—more an exploration, an experiment to see if we could reach new collectors. We had 109 new collectors buy Jeres's work, which I thought was a good result until Highlight mentioned 40,000 wallets on Zancan.

Trinity: You can't compete with free.

Jamie Gourlay: Free is a good strategy. It was eye-opening seeing the feedback—and pushback—following the Solana release. Amazing how political blockchains can be.

Trinity: Do you see any L2s in your future? Base has onboarded 40,000 new people for the first time, it's low-cost, well integrated—is that something you're open to after your experience with Solana?

Jamie Gourlay: For sure. Base is top of our product meeting agenda for Monday. If something can help us out—low gas is certainly helpful, and it can bring new people—that sounds good. We're really keen to keep our product as simple as possible, so we don't want to compromise that, but I don't think new chains will hurt it much. And the benefit of reaching new collectors is probably worth it.

Anticyclone — William Mapan

Will: The way to prove the strategy would be to consistently show that collector base good art and dare them to show up. If they don't, after enough tries, you can say: you said you wanted this, we gave you a really nice curated experience, and the liquidity's there, but it turns out they're not that interested in collecting art—they're more interested in commoditizing and flipping.

Jamie Gourlay: We don't want to shout "we've got a new Solana release coming out"—that feels like it misses the point, and it's not a great look for the artist. With Jeres's release, we mentioned it was on Solana, but tried not to hype it as a Solana release specifically. Though I feel like you almost have to, if you really want to get that crowd excited. Ideally it should be a good art release, not a "Solana release."

Trinity: Did you get pushback from people saying, "I don't want to collect this because it's on Solana and Ethereum is my chain of choice"?

Jamie Gourlay: From a couple of people, yeah—mainly because of how centralized the Solana Foundation is.

Will: There's a vocal set of Web3 purists who'll say, "I'll never collect on Solana because it's centralized," and so on. So the trade-off is: a couple people won't collect it, but the whole point is to tap into potential users who, for whatever reason, haven't made the jump yet. To me, the most confounding part of that whole argument was: if they want art, they can come to it—why do you have to go to them? That's what I never understood about the Solana narrative from late last year, this idea that everyone should keep an open mind and come over to look at Solana, when all the art has been on ETH and Tezos for the most part. My takeaway: either keep pushing or don't, because if it's just a drip here and there, you'll never find out if there's really a breakthrough moment.

Jamie Gourlay: That makes sense. Bitcoin's obviously a totally different kettle of fish.

Anticyclone — William Mapan

Trinity: A very expensive and lucrative kettle of fish.

Jamie Gourlay: We've been trying to figure out the extent to which we should just aim to offer artists tools they can use. If an artist comes to us and says "I want to release on Bitcoin," should we say no? Or should we just give them the best tools we can to let them do what they want?

Will: It depends on the cost of getting it set up. It doesn't seem trivial to run a Bitcoin minting platform, since there are no smart contracts—there's a lot of stuff I just don't understand about it. It seems like it wouldn't be as simple as the Solana thing, since Solana is EVM-compatible, right? So you were probably able to take a lot of your existing contracts and make them work there.

Jamie Gourlay: I'm assured by Agoston Nagy, our CTO, that it wouldn't be too difficult to get up and running on Bitcoin, but it would still be work, obviously.

Will: Where should we go from here, Trinity? We have to wrap it soon because my kid's going to come bursting through the door.

Trinity: We've covered a lot—open platforms versus closed platforms, different chains and cryptocurrencies. I don't know if this is the best place to end, but I did have a quick question. What's your take on the recent Art Blocks announcement? I think Art Blocks is one of your core competitors, at least in the closed-platform space that's releasing great stuff.

Anticyclone — William Mapan

Jamie Gourlay: The tricky thing about the curated way of doing things is that it's pretty hard for a gallery to ever become a venture-scale business. We've taken VC funding, and I'm pretty sure they have too. Banking on Verse solo releases—sure, you can build a good business doing that, but probably not at venture scale. So we don't really have a choice but to figure out something more scalable in addition to our gallery model, and I'm presuming they're seeing things similarly.

We gave a lot of thought to whether we should be semi-open, which is what I think they're moving toward. We decided not to, because we thought an open platform wouldn't be able to compete with a curated platform for the best releases. If you're an artist and you can go to a semi-open platform, or to a platform that's going to do everything it possibly can to shine a bright light on your work, I struggle to see why you'd choose the semi-open one. So that's why we didn't go down that route.

I can't say I fully understand the difference between Presents and their new model—I think it's only going to be open to artists who've released on Art Blocks before. I'm curious how this differs from Presents, since Presents releases work on a fairly structured schedule, roughly once every certain number of days. Is this going to be Presents but free-for-all? I doubt it, but if it is, is that an improvement? I don't know.

Will: You'll have to listen to that interview. One thing we didn't get into, which I regret, was how the business model might change under something more influenced by platforms like Highlight—a fee-per-mint model where artists keep everything and revenue scales with edition size. If an artist wants to do a big blowout, like Zancan did—Highlight minted over $100,000 worth of a piece he gave away for free. fx(hash) would've made no money on that drop if Zancan had done it there. So as strange as that model might've initially sounded, I think it's showing real power in this market. The optimistic read is: if you anticipate the market coming back next year, you want something semi-open so your curated artists have a place to release and you can own that. But that could just be another six-month heyday before it disappears. So I think it has to be part of a bigger plan than just catching the next wave.

Jamie Gourlay: I'm really excited to see where Art Blocks and Enjin go with this. It feels like a lot of platforms are trying to figure out how this jigsaw fits together without everyone overlapping. We've worked with Art Blocks and Enjin in the past, and my understanding is the Verse team will be part of building out a marketplace for everything their partners release. That sounds awesome—they've got amazing collectors, and we'd love to do more Enjin releases if it means those releases show up on that marketplace. Ditto Highlight—sounds like they're building something similar.

I think there's going to be a lot more collaboration going forward. We've spoken with the Art Blocks/Enjin team, with Foundation, with Highlight—it's clear that the more eyes on a release, the better. If we can work with Art Blocks/Enjin, release something on Verse that also features on Foundation, that's a win for everyone, especially the artist. A year from now, I really hope it doesn't feel like we're competing for releases. I hope we're just seen as taking a fee for shining an extra light on a release, and if the partnering gallery feels we add value doing that, great—that's a win for everyone, and we're not taking anyone's lunch.

Anticyclone — William Mapan

Actually, Trinity, I think it was your last episode before Christmas—you said something like it's frustrating having to keep up with Discord and Twitter just to know what's going on. That pain is real. We're hoping to be an aggregator for interesting projects, without charging crazy fees. Maybe we partner with a project powered by Highlight that's also showing up on Foundation, and we charge a little just for the feature. That's how I see things moving forward.

Trinity: One benefit of these closed platforms supporting each drop, versus an open platform, is visibility. If you've logged onto Twitter at any point in the last three or four weeks, you've probably heard of Barbarians—seen it, know where it is, know what it looks like. The value of consolidation is real. You get a lot more network effect than one artist trying to promote one drop on one platform, because fx(hash) can't give that level of promotion to every single release.

Jamie Gourlay: It was interesting seeing the Bright Moments Artist Residence program show up on Foundation, powered by Highlight, with I think another partner involved too. It really does feel like the more collaborators on something, the better for everyone. Strange, but maybe that's the new world we're living in.

Will: Last question: what can you tell us about this Verse community token you've been floating?

Jamie Gourlay: It kind of stemmed from how fun Sketchbook A was. Our Discord was buzzy, and it was cool seeing people come together around that work. It's happening again with Barbarians—my colleague George mentioned he spoke with a collector today, a pretty crypto-native person, who hadn't collected before he saw Barbarians, jumped in, and now refreshes his twenty seeds every day. But projects like that don't come around too often, and I feel like we need some community glue.

Barbarians — Jacek Markusiewicz

Looking at what the Ringers and Squiggle communities have done for Art Blocks and fx(hash)—that's definitely glue. We haven't done much beyond a couple of tweets and conversations with some interesting artists, but if we could find a piece with that same feel—maybe a JPEG, maybe something conceptual, I really don't know yet—I think there could be real benefit for us, the artists, and collectors.

For Shettle's release a few weeks ago, we did an allowlist, which collectors really appreciated—it let Shettle say thank you to the people who'd supported him, and they felt good about how the auction played out. If a community token meant the top fifty holders were eligible for allowlists, or something like that, I think it'd be good for everyone and create a spirit that doesn't really exist in our Discord yet. I don't think we've built a real community the way Art Blocks and fx(hash) have. It's probably not a coincidence that both have these iconic emblems representing who they are. It's really just an idea at this point—not sure if anything will come of it.

Will: The obvious play is getting Zancan to make something, then setting up a "burn five Carbon Captures to redeem" mechanism. That could finally give all the Carbon Captures out there a reason to be used.

Carbon Captures — Zancan

Trinity: There aren't that many Carbon Captures, really—not compared to the Highlight drop. We thought Carbon Captures was big, but it's minuscule by comparison.

Will: I was surprised there was no Carbon Capture one-year-anniversary thing. I thought you guys might announce something around that.

Jamie Gourlay: We spoke with Michael about doing something, and for whatever reason it didn't pan out.

Trinity: He's very busy.

Jamie Gourlay: It's genuinely tricky talking about anything Zancan-related, because whatever you say, people latch onto it and buy or sell based on it. But I agree, that would be awesome. Have you ever talked with him about anything like that—anything Carbon Capture-related?

Will: When we had dinner with him about a year and a half ago, we floated the idea of burning them, or some project built around that. But now this is going to sound like we have alpha.

Carbon Captures — Zancan

Jamie Gourlay: I definitely have no alpha whatsoever. Nothing's even close to solid on that front.

Will: Fair enough. Trinity, anything to close us out?

Trinity: One rapid-fire question. If you had to pick any NFT project from this latest cycle—can't say Squiggles, can't say Fidenzas, can't say Punks, maybe not even Apes—which one will be worth millions in the next bull run? Give me my get-rich-quick scheme.

Jamie Gourlay: No idea. Everyone's talking about A Line Draw a Day and Nice Aunties. Fellowship is killing it—those seem to be the ones on everyone's lips. I suspect it'll come from a big series, though. I actually saw someone predicting Life in West America is going to be massive. Rupee is brilliant, so maybe that's not a bad shout.

Will: All AI projects.

Trinity: We didn't even get into that—how Verse has moved away from generative code toward AI.

Carbon Captures — Zancan

Jamie Gourlay: I don't think we've moved away—Yazid's a generative artist.

Trinity: You're opening the aperture on what you include.

Jamie Gourlay: Yeah, we've said from the outset that we're a platform for digital art, not specifically generative art. But yes, there's certainly a lot of AI happening.

Will: Well, we'll see you in a year or two.

Jamie Gourlay: Looking forward to it. Thanks so much for having me.

Will: Thank you, Jamie—great to have you back. Really excited to chop it up about the market, about Verse, and everything you all are doing. We look forward to seeing what this community token turns into, if it happens—no guarantees or alpha implied there. Looking forward to more solo releases and everything else you bring this year. Keep it up.

Carbon Captures — Zancan

Jamie Gourlay: Awesome. Thank you so much.

Will: All right, everyone. Well, that was Jamie, round two with Verse. I hope you all enjoyed. We'll be back again soon with another episode. Thanks to Jamie, thanks to Trinity. All right, bye-bye.

Jamie Gourlay: We're waiting, always. We're waiting to be signed.

Change log

  • Initial transcript — auto-transcribed (AssemblyAI) and readability-edited.